housekeeping: the inventory a stranger reads first
From a reading of the gate's documents (2026-10-21): - AGENTS.md: Steps 14 and 15 shown Pending while the Port and both sockets have carried live traffic since the gate was built → Done, with what carries them; "next build task" now points at the open items, the phase tables being complete. - README.md: the repository tree omitted azazel_processor, kushya_generator, mesorah, src/tools and scripts → listed, each in a line. - deploy/ARCHITECTURE.md: the judgment path holds no model, said in writing — the examination is Python patterns and Prolog rules, the judges consult that Prolog; kushya_generator (a fine-tuned model in this repo, not deployed, not wired) is an OFFERER whose output is examined, never a component the bedikah, the engine or a judge consults. The kohen is not the offerer. azazel_processor listed. - The map: the repository is public; eleven files named the ingress NLB's literal address and five the kohen's kubeconfig path. Docs now use the domains (git.bikoret.ch, bikoret.ch) or "<NLB-IP>" with the kubectl query that answers it; the kubeconfig is "$KUBECONFIG" / "$HOME/.kube/<your-cluster>.yaml". gitea-public-apply.sh takes NLB from the environment. None of it was a secret; all of it was a map. - OTP pin: checked, not changed — the segfault in the build log was a source-built OTP 26.2.1 on macOS; the image is hexpm's 26.2.1 with ERL_FLAGS +JMsingle. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
50b08cba4b
commit
354e223384
15 files changed
+38
-29
No files matched your search
@@ -11,10 +11,14 @@ One Kubernetes namespace runs the following:
|
||||
| `vav-pipeline` | Elixir/OTP release | Bereishit cycle, ShemaContext, Cloud, Manna, HTTP API (pe'ah, courtyard, chatzer, kodesh) |
|
||||
| `shoresh-engine` | Haskell binary, spawned by vav-pipeline as an Erlang Port (staged into the pod by the `shoresh-engine-install` init container — NOT a sidecar container; a Port is a child process of the BEAM and cannot cross a container boundary) | Root activation, te'amim parsing, gematria |
|
||||
| `talmudic-engine` | SWI-Prolog (sidecar via Unix socket) | 613 mitzvot, 13 middot, kushya generation, teiku |
|
||||
| `korban-processor` | Python 3.12 (sidecar) | Offering protocol, eish zarah validation |
|
||||
| `korban-processor` | Python 3.12 (sidecar) | Offering protocol, eish zarah validation, the bedikah's readings (pattern-based: `korban_processor/bedikah.py`) |
|
||||
| `kushya_generator/` | Fine-tuned model — **not deployed, not wired** | An OFFERER, if it is ever run: its output arrives at the gate like any model's and is examined. It is never a component the bedikah, the Talmudic Engine or the Sanhedrin consults. |
|
||||
| `azazel_processor/` | Python — run by the kohen, not in the pod | Disposal records (the goat for Azazel); `VavPipeline.AzazelIngest` reads its files into L3 |
|
||||
|
||||
All four run in the same pod. vav-pipeline is the main container; talmudic-engine and korban-processor are sidecars; shoresh-engine runs inside vav-pipeline as an Erlang Port child process, staged in by an init container.
|
||||
|
||||
**No model stands on the judgment path.** The examination of an output — the offering protocol, the seven readings, the halt rules — is Python pattern extraction and Prolog rules, and the Sanhedrin's judges consult that same Prolog. Nothing that examines is a model, and nothing a model produces is consulted as a rule. The kohen is not the offerer. A fine-tuned model in this repository (`kushya_generator/`) is an offerer or a tool whose output is itself examined; wiring it into the bedikah, the engine or a judge would put the offerer on the altar, and is refused by this document before anyone does it for convenience.
|
||||
|
||||
## External dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
| Dependency | Purpose | Contract |
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user