housekeeping: the inventory a stranger reads first

From a reading of the gate's documents (2026-10-21):
- AGENTS.md: Steps 14 and 15 shown Pending while the Port and both
  sockets have carried live traffic since the gate was built → Done,
  with what carries them; "next build task" now points at the open
  items, the phase tables being complete.
- README.md: the repository tree omitted azazel_processor,
  kushya_generator, mesorah, src/tools and scripts → listed, each in a
  line.
- deploy/ARCHITECTURE.md: the judgment path holds no model, said in
  writing — the examination is Python patterns and Prolog rules, the
  judges consult that Prolog; kushya_generator (a fine-tuned model in
  this repo, not deployed, not wired) is an OFFERER whose output is
  examined, never a component the bedikah, the engine or a judge
  consults. The kohen is not the offerer. azazel_processor listed.
- The map: the repository is public; eleven files named the ingress
  NLB's literal address and five the kohen's kubeconfig path. Docs now
  use the domains (git.bikoret.ch, bikoret.ch) or "<NLB-IP>" with the
  kubectl query that answers it; the kubeconfig is "$KUBECONFIG" /
  "$HOME/.kube/<your-cluster>.yaml". gitea-public-apply.sh takes NLB
  from the environment. None of it was a secret; all of it was a map.
- OTP pin: checked, not changed — the segfault in the build log was a
  source-built OTP 26.2.1 on macOS; the image is hexpm's 26.2.1 with
  ERL_FLAGS +JMsingle.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Scott KarpandClaude Fable 5.1 committed 2026-10-21 18:32:35 +00:00
1 parent 50b08cba4b
commit 354e223384
15 files changed
+38 -29

No files matched your search

+3 -3
View File
@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
# Gitea behind the shared ingress — TCP passthrough
#
# One NLB for the cluster (185.19.28.170, the ingress-nginx Service)
# One NLB for the cluster (<NLB-IP>, the ingress-nginx Service)
# instead of one per Service. Bikoret is an HTTP Ingress
# (service.yaml). Gitea has no hostname that resolves
# (gitea.temple-council.ch is configured in Gitea and exists nowhere),
# and host-based routing needs a name — so Gitea rides the ingress
# controller's TCP passthrough on two ports of the same NLB:
#
# 185.19.28.170:3000 → temple-council/gitea:80 (HTTP — git, web UI)
# 185.19.28.170:22 → temple-council/gitea:22 (SSH)
# <NLB-IP>:3000 → temple-council/gitea:80 (HTTP — git, web UI)
# <NLB-IP>:22 → temple-council/gitea:22 (SSH)
#
# Three live objects carry this; only the first is a whole manifest:
#