housekeeping: the inventory a stranger reads first
From a reading of the gate's documents (2026-10-21): - AGENTS.md: Steps 14 and 15 shown Pending while the Port and both sockets have carried live traffic since the gate was built → Done, with what carries them; "next build task" now points at the open items, the phase tables being complete. - README.md: the repository tree omitted azazel_processor, kushya_generator, mesorah, src/tools and scripts → listed, each in a line. - deploy/ARCHITECTURE.md: the judgment path holds no model, said in writing — the examination is Python patterns and Prolog rules, the judges consult that Prolog; kushya_generator (a fine-tuned model in this repo, not deployed, not wired) is an OFFERER whose output is examined, never a component the bedikah, the engine or a judge consults. The kohen is not the offerer. azazel_processor listed. - The map: the repository is public; eleven files named the ingress NLB's literal address and five the kohen's kubeconfig path. Docs now use the domains (git.bikoret.ch, bikoret.ch) or "<NLB-IP>" with the kubectl query that answers it; the kubeconfig is "$KUBECONFIG" / "$HOME/.kube/<your-cluster>.yaml". gitea-public-apply.sh takes NLB from the environment. None of it was a secret; all of it was a map. - OTP pin: checked, not changed — the segfault in the build log was a source-built OTP 26.2.1 on macOS; the image is hexpm's 26.2.1 with ERL_FLAGS +JMsingle. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
50b08cba4b
commit
354e223384
15 files changed
+38
-29
No files matched your search
@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
|
||||
# Gitea behind the shared ingress — TCP passthrough
|
||||
#
|
||||
# One NLB for the cluster (185.19.28.170, the ingress-nginx Service)
|
||||
# One NLB for the cluster (<NLB-IP>, the ingress-nginx Service)
|
||||
# instead of one per Service. Bikoret is an HTTP Ingress
|
||||
# (service.yaml). Gitea has no hostname that resolves
|
||||
# (gitea.temple-council.ch is configured in Gitea and exists nowhere),
|
||||
# and host-based routing needs a name — so Gitea rides the ingress
|
||||
# controller's TCP passthrough on two ports of the same NLB:
|
||||
#
|
||||
# 185.19.28.170:3000 → temple-council/gitea:80 (HTTP — git, web UI)
|
||||
# 185.19.28.170:22 → temple-council/gitea:22 (SSH)
|
||||
# <NLB-IP>:3000 → temple-council/gitea:80 (HTTP — git, web UI)
|
||||
# <NLB-IP>:22 → temple-council/gitea:22 (SSH)
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Three live objects carry this; only the first is a whole manifest:
|
||||
#
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user