the second scroll: the mesorah snapshot, pinned and read (bishe'arecha step 6)
Devarim 17:18 — the king writes his copy from before the priests, not from
memory. scripts/build_mesorah.py takes one open-licence version per work
per language from the Sefaria export (bucket sefaria-export, catalogue of
2026-10-02; Public Domain / CC0 / CC-BY / CC-BY-SA only, checked in every
file; no CC-BY-NC — the Bavli is Wikisource's) and lays it down beside
L1: mesorah/works/<slug>/{he,en}.json, index.json, integrity.sha256,
build_report.json. 128 works (Rashi, Onkelos, Ramban, Ibn Ezra, Sforno
on the Torah; all of Mishnah; 37 Bavli tractates; Bereshit and Shemot
Rabbah, Sifrei, Tanchuma), 256 files, 44.9 MiB, tree hash 7d5b3a6c…
computed as L1's (sorted relative path, then bytes; the two post-hash
files excluded). What is out, and why (licence), is in Terumah §E5.
Read, never fetched: korban_processor/mesorah.py finds citations as
written (Rashi on Devarim 6:5, Berakhot 2a, Mishnah Berakhot 1:1,
Bereshit Rabbah 1:1, Sifrei Devarim 32, Tanchuma Bereshit 1 …), resolves
each against the snapshot (complex works through their unnamed node,
Tanchuma by parashah), lists them as examination.mesorah_references, and
makes every passage found a given source for that examination — so a
claim about Rashi anchors in Rashi or does not. The Vav Pipeline couples
coupled(reference(R), mesorah(Work, [Address])) or not_in_mesorah; the
engine accepts mesorah/2 as a terminal and not_in_mesorah is Form 4.
VavPipeline.Mesorah pins the hash, re-reads the tree at startup and every
ten minutes, and /kodesh/health carries mesorah_hash. Mounted read-only at
/mnt/mesorah in the vav-pipeline and korban-processor images. L3
bedikot.mesorah (migration 20261013000002).
Also: the 1-in-12 Day6 serving failure of 2026-10-04 reproduced with seed
446116 — HaltMonitorTest left the system halted; it now resolves on exit
and the Day6 setup is defensive. Construction §3.11, Terumah §E5, Tamid
§1.1, bishearecha §IV, KOHEN, AGENTS. Doorpost 0638d4eb…. Elixir 604/0
(seeds 835592 and 446116), korban 294/1 skipped, Prolog bedikah 44/44,
L3 10/0.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
ffccedb63a
commit
5e325d36cc
288 files changed
+8809
-10
No files matched your search
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
||||
{"categories":["Talmud","Bavli","Seder Moed"],"heTitle":"ביצה","language":"en","license":"CC0","sectionNames":["Daf","Line"],"text":[[],[],["Mishnah: An egg laid [lit. born, Heb. 'nolad'] on Yom Tov, Beit Shammai say: \"It may be eaten\"; and Beit Hillel say: \"It may not be eaten.\"... Beit Shammai say: \"Leaven – [a size] similar to an olive; chameitz – [a size] similar to a date\"; and Beit Hillel say: \"Both [the size] similar to an olive.\"","One who slaughters an animal or bird on Yom Tov, Beit Shammai say: \"Dig with a spade and cover it [the blood]\"; and Beit Hillel say: \"He shall not slaughter [it] unless he had set dirt aside from before Yom [Tov]\" – but they concede that if [it] was [already] slaughtered, one can dig with a spade and cover it [the blood] because the ashes of the oven are set aside [for use on Yom Tov by default].","Gemara: What is the case? If you say it is dealing with a chicken that is designated for food, what is the reasoning of Beit Hillel – it's broken off food!","But, if it is dealing with a chicken that is designated for laying eggs, what is the reasoning for Beit Shammai –","it's muktzeh! [I.e. not 'set aside'] But what's the issue: perhaps Beit Shammai doesn't have muktzeh!?","It seems to us [that] even the one who permits muktzeh would forbid nolad [like the egg]. [So] what's the reasoning of Beit Shammai?","Rav Nahman says: \"It is certainly [dealing] with a chicken designated to lay eggs; and the one who has muktzeh has nolad; and the one who doesn't have muktzeh doesn't have nolad; and Beit Shammai are according to Rabbi Shimon, and Beit Hillel are according to Rabbi Yehudah.","But did Rav Nahman really say this? [For] is it not taught [in a Mishnah]: \"Beit Shammai say: 'Lift the bones and shells off the table [on shabbat]', while Beit Hilel say: 'Lift up the whole tray and shake it.'\"","And Rav Nahman said [about this]: \"We only have Beit Shammai according to Rabbi Yehudah and Beit Hillel according to Rabbi Shimon!\"","[But] Rav Nahman would say to you [in his defence]: \"Regarding shabbat, the tanna [i.e. the Mishnah] was anonymised for us according to Rabbi Shimon, as it is taught [in a Mishnah]: 'Chop the cucumbers before the cattle, and the corpse before the dogs [on shabbat].' We assign this to Beit Hillel according to Rabbi Shimon.","But,"],["regarding Yom Tov, the tanna was anonymised for us according to Rabbi Yehudah, as it is taught [in a Mishnah]: '[We] do not chop wood from the beams, nor from the beam that broke, on Yom Tov.' We assign this to Beit Hillel according to Rabbi Yehudah.\"","Since the one who anonymised our Mishnah was Rabbi, what's the difference between shabbat that he would anonymise [it] for us according to Rabbi Shimon and Yom Tov that he would anonymise [it] for us according to Rabbi Yehudah?","They said: \"Shabbat, since it is strict and people will not come to cheapen it, [Rabbi] anonymised [it] for us according to Rabbi Shimon who is lenient [regarding muktzeh]. Yom Tov, since it is lenient and people will come to cheapen it, [Rabbi] anonymised [it] for us according to Rabbi Yehudah who is script [regarding muktzeh].\"","But what's the case? It's a chicken that is designated to lay eggs, and [the argument is] regarding muktzeh. If so, this disagreement about the egg – let them [Beit Hillel and Beit Shammai] disagree about the chicken","[The Mishnah is framed as about the egg] in order to show you the strength of Beit Shammai['s position] that they permit [even] nolad.","But [then] let them disagree about the chicken in order to show you the strength of Beit Hillel['s position] that they forbid [even] muktzeh!? And if you want to say that the strength of [the argument] of permission [needs to be] stronger [than the strength of the argument of forbidding to prove their point], let them argue about both:","\"A chicken that is designated to lay eggs – it and its egg – Beit Shammai say: 'It may be eaten'; and Beit Hillel say: 'It may not be eaten'\"!?","Rather, Rabbah says: \"It's certainly a chicken that is designated for food; and [its a case of] Yom Tov that falls after shabbat; and it's [an argument] regarding preparation,\" for Rabbah thinks","[that] each egg that is born today was finished from yesterday,","and Rabbah goes according to his opionion, as Rabbah says: \"What does [the Torah mean when] it is written: 'On the sixth day, they shall prepare what they brought' [regarding the double portion of manna on Friday] (Exodus 16:5)? [It means:] [on] a non-sacred [day we] prepare for shabbat, and [on] a non-sacred [day we] prepare for Yom Tov; but [we] do not prepare [on] Yom Tov for shabbat, nor is there preparation [on] shabbat for Yom Tov.\"","Abaye said to him: \"From your reasoning, a regular Yom Tov [not after a shabbat], let them permit [the egg]!\" \"A [rabbinic] decree because of Yom Tov after shabbat.\" \"[And] a regular shabbat, let them permit [the egg]!\" \"A [rabbinic] decree because of shabLine truncated
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user