the second scroll: the mesorah snapshot, pinned and read (bishe'arecha step 6)

Devarim 17:18 — the king writes his copy from before the priests, not from memory. scripts/build_mesorah.py takes one open-licence version per work per language from the Sefaria export (bucket sefaria-export, catalogue of 2026-10-02; Public Domain / CC0 / CC-BY / CC-BY-SA only, checked in every file; no CC-BY-NC — the Bavli is Wikisource's) and lays it down beside L1: mesorah/works/<slug>/{he,en}.json, index.json, integrity.sha256, build_report.json. 128 works (Rashi, Onkelos, Ramban, Ibn Ezra, Sforno on the Torah; all of Mishnah; 37 Bavli tractates; Bereshit and Shemot Rabbah, Sifrei, Tanchuma), 256 files, 44.9 MiB, tree hash 7d5b3a6c… computed as L1's (sorted relative path, then bytes; the two post-hash files excluded). What is out, and why (licence), is in Terumah §E5. Read, never fetched: korban_processor/mesorah.py finds citations as written (Rashi on Devarim 6:5, Berakhot 2a, Mishnah Berakhot 1:1, Bereshit Rabbah 1:1, Sifrei Devarim 32, Tanchuma Bereshit 1 …), resolves each against the snapshot (complex works through their unnamed node, Tanchuma by parashah), lists them as examination.mesorah_references, and makes every passage found a given source for that examination — so a claim about Rashi anchors in Rashi or does not. The Vav Pipeline couples coupled(reference(R), mesorah(Work, [Address])) or not_in_mesorah; the engine accepts mesorah/2 as a terminal and not_in_mesorah is Form 4. VavPipeline.Mesorah pins the hash, re-reads the tree at startup and every ten minutes, and /kodesh/health carries mesorah_hash. Mounted read-only at /mnt/mesorah in the vav-pipeline and korban-processor images. L3 bedikot.mesorah (migration 20261013000002). Also: the 1-in-12 Day6 serving failure of 2026-10-04 reproduced with seed 446116 — HaltMonitorTest left the system halted; it now resolves on exit and the Day6 setup is defensive. Construction §3.11, Terumah §E5, Tamid §1.1, bishearecha §IV, KOHEN, AGENTS. Doorpost 0638d4eb…. Elixir 604/0 (seeds 835592 and 446116), korban 294/1 skipped, Prolog bedikah 44/44, L3 10/0. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-13 19:13:36 +00:00
1 parent ffccedb63a
commit 5e325d36cc
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"categories":["Talmud","Bavli","Seder Kodashim"],"heTitle":"חולין","language":"en","license":"CC0","sectionNames":["Daf","Line"],"text":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],["   ","    ","   ","        ","      ","    ","   ","  ","","     ","  "," ","    ","   ","Is this learned from here? It is learned from the following source."],["\"... from one of the people of the land...\" These words exclude a mumar.","Rabbi Shimon son of Yossi says in the name of (a different) Rabbi Shimon: \"... If someone accidently transgresses a mitzvah 'lo taaseh' and realises his guilt.\" If he accepts his guilt he brings an offering for his sin, but if he doesn't accept his guilt he does not bring an offering for his sin.","And we say what is the difference between them? (Referring to the two previous pasukim.) And Rav Hamnuna said: The difference between them is a case in which a mumar eats chelev (a forbidden fat) and brings an offering for eating blood.","These previous two pasukim are talking about a sin offering while the original pasuk is talking about a burnt offering. We need both pasukim because if we only knew about the mumar's prohibition from giving a sin offering we would say that this is because a sin offering is for atonement and the mumar has not attoned, but we would say that he could bring a burnt offering because the burnt offering is a gift. If we only had the pasuk about the burnt offering we would say that a mumar cannot bring it because it is not obligatory, but we would say that the mumar is obligated in the sin offering. Therefor, we need both pasukim.","Does every place where it mentions an \"animal\" carry a negative connotation? No, because it says: \"Man and beast You deliver, O LORD\" (Psalm 36:7). Rav Yehudah quoted Rav: These are people who are mentally crafty but humble like beasts. There it says \"man and beast.\" Here it says only \"beast.\"","Does every place where it says \"man and beast\" have a positive connotation? No, because it is written: \"I will sow the House of Israel and the House of Judah with the seed of man and seed of beast.\" (The Gemara in Sota 22a says that the seed of beast refers to Jews who haven't learned any torah.\")  This pasuk separated them. \"seed of man,\" and \"seed of beast\" are said individually. (As opposed to saying \"the seed of man and beast.\") ","Rav Chanan quoted Rabbi Yaakov son of Eedy who was quoting Rav Yehoshua son of Levi who was quoting Bar Kaparah who said:","\"Rav Gamliel and his court ruled that shchita (the Jewish form of slaughter) done by a Samaritan is not kosher.\" Rabbi Zeyra said to Rabbi Yaakov son of Eedy: \"Maybe you heard about the case when there is no Jew watching the Samaritan.\" Rabbi Yaakov son of Eedy responded to Rabbi Zeyra. \"You sound like a person who has never learned Talmud.\""],[],[],["","  ","     ","   "," ","","    "," ","    "," It happened that R. Pinchas ben Yair was on his way to redeem captives, but was stopped at the banks of the River Gannai. He said to the river,","\"Gannai, part your waters for me, that I may pass through you.\" The river replied, \"You are on your way to fulfill the desire of your Creator.  I am on my way to fulfill the desire of my Creator.  For you, there is doubt about whether you will or will not.  For me, it is certain that I will.\" He said to [the river], \"If you do not part [for me], I will cause a decree to issued against you, that water will never again flow through you.\" The river parted for him."],["An individual does not [so much as] bruise his finger below [i.e. on earth], unless it is so ordained by above [in Heaven], as it says, The steps of man are guided by the L-rd"],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],["Mishna: One who slaughters on Shabbat or on Yom Kippur, even though he's liable for his soul, his slaughtering is Kosher.","Gamarra: Rav Huna says that Hiiya bar Rav expounded in the name of Rav, [that this slaughtered animal] is forbidden to eat on the day. The Yeshiva Bochrim in the academy came to think that this ruling of rag reflects the view of Rabbi Yehuda. Which of Rabbi Yehuda's mishnayot? It's Rabbi Yehuda about preparation. For it was taught in a mishnah that one can chop up gourds for an animal, or a carcass for a dogs. But Rabbi Yehuda says that if it wasn't a carcass as of shabbat eve, then it's forbidden..."],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],["","Mishnah: In the case where one is obligated [in tithing] in bitter almonds they are exempt from sweet ones, when they are obligated in sweet ones, they are exempt from bitter ones. Gemarra: The rabbis taught in a beraita, Almonds that are bitter and small are obligated. Big ones are exempt. Sweet ones that are big are obligated, while the small ones are exempt. Rabbi Yishmael in the name of Rabbi Yossi says in the name of his father: Both this one and that one are exempt. And some say [that he said] both this and this are obligated. Rabbi Ilai says.... Mishnah: The grape seeds thatLine truncated
				`@@ -0,0 +1 @@`
				{"categories":["Talmud","Bavli","Seder Kodashim"],"heTitle":"חולין","language":"en","license":"CC0","sectionNames":["Daf","Line"],"text":[[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[" "," "," "," "," "," "," "," ",""," "," "," "," "," ","Is this learned from here? It is learned from the following source."],["\"... from one of the people of the land...\" These words exclude a mumar.","Rabbi Shimon son of Yossi says in the name of (a different) Rabbi Shimon: \"... If someone accidently transgresses a mitzvah 'lo taaseh' and realises his guilt.\" If he accepts his guilt he brings an offering for his sin, but if he doesn't accept his guilt he does not bring an offering for his sin.","And we say what is the difference between them? (Referring to the two previous pasukim.) And Rav Hamnuna said: The difference between them is a case in which a mumar eats chelev (a forbidden fat) and brings an offering for eating blood.","These previous two pasukim are talking about a sin offering while the original pasuk is talking about a burnt offering. We need both pasukim because if we only knew about the mumar's prohibition from giving a sin offering we would say that this is because a sin offering is for atonement and the mumar has not attoned, but we would say that he could bring a burnt offering because the burnt offering is a gift. If we only had the pasuk about the burnt offering we would say that a mumar cannot bring it because it is not obligatory, but we would say that the mumar is obligated in the sin offering. Therefor, we need both pasukim.","Does every place where it mentions an \"animal\" carry a negative connotation? No, because it says: \"Man and beast You deliver, O LORD\" (Psalm 36:7). Rav Yehudah quoted Rav: These are people who are mentally crafty but humble like beasts. There it says \"man and beast.\" Here it says only \"beast.\"","Does every place where it says \"man and beast\" have a positive connotation? No, because it is written: \"I will sow the House of Israel and the House of Judah with the seed of man and seed of beast.\" (The Gemara in Sota 22a says that the seed of beast refers to Jews who haven't learned any torah.\") This pasuk separated them. \"seed of man,\" and \"seed of beast\" are said individually. (As opposed to saying \"the seed of man and beast.\") ","Rav Chanan quoted Rabbi Yaakov son of Eedy who was quoting Rav Yehoshua son of Levi who was quoting Bar Kaparah who said:","\"Rav Gamliel and his court ruled that shchita (the Jewish form of slaughter) done by a Samaritan is not kosher.\" Rabbi Zeyra said to Rabbi Yaakov son of Eedy: \"Maybe you heard about the case when there is no Jew watching the Samaritan.\" Rabbi Yaakov son of Eedy responded to Rabbi Zeyra. \"You sound like a person who has never learned Talmud.\""],[],[],[""," "," "," "," ",""," "," "," "," It happened that R. Pinchas ben Yair was on his way to redeem captives, but was stopped at the banks of the River Gannai. He said to the river,","\"Gannai, part your waters for me, that I may pass through you.\" The river replied, \"You are on your way to fulfill the desire of your Creator. I am on my way to fulfill the desire of my Creator. For you, there is doubt about whether you will or will not. For me, it is certain that I will.\" He said to [the river], \"If you do not part [for me], I will cause a decree to issued against you, that water will never again flow through you.\" The river parted for him."],["An individual does not [so much as] bruise his finger below [i.e. on earth], unless it is so ordained by above [in Heaven], as it says, The steps of man are guided by the L-rd"],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],["Mishna: One who slaughters on Shabbat or on Yom Kippur, even though he's liable for his soul, his slaughtering is Kosher.","Gamarra: Rav Huna says that Hiiya bar Rav expounded in the name of Rav, [that this slaughtered animal] is forbidden to eat on the day. The Yeshiva Bochrim in the academy came to think that this ruling of rag reflects the view of Rabbi Yehuda. Which of Rabbi Yehuda's mishnayot? It's Rabbi Yehuda about preparation. For it was taught in a mishnah that one can chop up gourds for an animal, or a carcass for a dogs. But Rabbi Yehuda says that if it wasn't a carcass as of shabbat eve, then it's forbidden..."],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],["","Mishnah: In the case where one is obligated [in tithing] in bitter almonds they are exempt from sweet ones, when they are obligated in sweet ones, they are exempt from bitter ones. Gemarra: The rabbis taught in a beraita, Almonds that are bitter and small are obligated. Big ones are exempt. Sweet ones that are big are obligated, while the small ones are exempt. Rabbi Yishmael in the name of Rabbi Yossi says in the name of his father: Both this one and that one are exempt. And some say [that he said] both this and this are obligated. Rabbi Ilai says.... Mishnah: The grape seeds thatLine truncated