the second scroll: the mesorah snapshot, pinned and read (bishe'arecha step 6)

Devarim 17:18 — the king writes his copy from before the priests, not from memory. scripts/build_mesorah.py takes one open-licence version per work per language from the Sefaria export (bucket sefaria-export, catalogue of 2026-10-02; Public Domain / CC0 / CC-BY / CC-BY-SA only, checked in every file; no CC-BY-NC — the Bavli is Wikisource's) and lays it down beside L1: mesorah/works/<slug>/{he,en}.json, index.json, integrity.sha256, build_report.json. 128 works (Rashi, Onkelos, Ramban, Ibn Ezra, Sforno on the Torah; all of Mishnah; 37 Bavli tractates; Bereshit and Shemot Rabbah, Sifrei, Tanchuma), 256 files, 44.9 MiB, tree hash 7d5b3a6c… computed as L1's (sorted relative path, then bytes; the two post-hash files excluded). What is out, and why (licence), is in Terumah §E5. Read, never fetched: korban_processor/mesorah.py finds citations as written (Rashi on Devarim 6:5, Berakhot 2a, Mishnah Berakhot 1:1, Bereshit Rabbah 1:1, Sifrei Devarim 32, Tanchuma Bereshit 1 …), resolves each against the snapshot (complex works through their unnamed node, Tanchuma by parashah), lists them as examination.mesorah_references, and makes every passage found a given source for that examination — so a claim about Rashi anchors in Rashi or does not. The Vav Pipeline couples coupled(reference(R), mesorah(Work, [Address])) or not_in_mesorah; the engine accepts mesorah/2 as a terminal and not_in_mesorah is Form 4. VavPipeline.Mesorah pins the hash, re-reads the tree at startup and every ten minutes, and /kodesh/health carries mesorah_hash. Mounted read-only at /mnt/mesorah in the vav-pipeline and korban-processor images. L3 bedikot.mesorah (migration 20261013000002). Also: the 1-in-12 Day6 serving failure of 2026-10-04 reproduced with seed 446116 — HaltMonitorTest left the system halted; it now resolves on exit and the Day6 setup is defensive. Construction §3.11, Terumah §E5, Tamid §1.1, bishearecha §IV, KOHEN, AGENTS. Doorpost 0638d4eb…. Elixir 604/0 (seeds 835592 and 446116), korban 294/1 skipped, Prolog bedikah 44/44, L3 10/0. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-13 19:13:36 +00:00
1 parent ffccedb63a
commit 5e325d36cc
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"categories":["Talmud","Bavli","Seder Nashim"],"heTitle":"קידושין","language":"en","license":"CC0","sectionNames":["Daf","Line"],"text":[[],[],["A woman is acquired in three ways and acquires herself in two ways.  [She is] acquired through money, a document and relations.   Through money: Beit Shammai say [this means] a dinar or the equivalent of a dinar. And Beit Hillel say a pruta or an equivalent of a pruta.  How much is a pruta? One eight of an Italian issar. ","She acquires herself through a bill of divorce or if her husband dies.  A Yevamah is acquired through relations and acquires herself through halitzah or the death of the Yavam. ","GEMARAH: A woman is acquired What is the difference here that it is written \"a woman is acquired\" and [the later mishna which states] \"the man sanctifies\"? Because the Tanna wanted to write \"money\", and money we have learned by analogy of the verb TAKE לקח - from the field of Ephron.","It is written here (Deut. 22:13) \"when a man takes a woman\" and it is written there (Gen. 23:13) \"I gave the money of the field, take it from me\".","And taking is called acquisition as it is written \"the field which Abraham bought\""],["Also \"fields will be bought with money\" (Jer. 32:44), the Tanna wrote \"the woman is acquired\".","Q: The Tanna should have written there (2:1) \"the man acquires\"? A: first he used biblical language and then rabbinical language. What is the meaning of the rabbinical language? - he makes her forbidden for the whole world, like property of the Temple.","Q: The Tanna should have written here (1:1) \"the man acquires\"? A: He wanted to write at the end \"she acquires herself\", he wrote in the beginning also a reference to herself.","Q: He should have written \"the man acquires and makes the [woman]acquire herself\"? A: Since in the case of the husband's death it is not him, but rather God who makes the wife acquire herself.","Or if you wish you could say If it was written \"[the man] acquires\" I would have thought that it means even against her will, therefore the Tanna wrote \"the woman is acquired\" - with her consent only","and what is the reason it(the mishna) teaches three(in the feminine)? Let it teach three (in the masculine)! Because they wanted to teach the word derech (way) and derech is a feminine word, as is written (in the torah): \"and you shall inform them the way(derech) they shall go upon (literally \"they shall go on her\"). (Exodus 18:20).","But what of that which was learnt (in a baraisa): (The mishna says:) \"In seven(masucline) ways(derachim), the zav is examined\" (Mishna Zavim, chapter 2). Let is teach seven (in the feminine)! (The mishna uses the masculine here) because they want to teach derech and derech is a masculine word, as is written (in the torah): In one way they will go out to you, and in seven (masculine) ways (derachim) they will flee before you. (Devarim 28: 7). (End of beraisa). If so, there is a difficulty between one verse (in torah) and the other, and there is a difficulty also between one mishna and the other.","Between one verse and the other, there is no difficulty. (For) here ( in the verse that was previously used to prove that derech is feminine), where torah is being referred to [and torah is a feminine word, as it says (in tanach): \"the teaching (torah) of Hash-m is perfect, restoring the soul\" (Tehillim 19:8).], (the word derech) is written as a feminine word. (However,) there (in the verse used in the beraisa to prove that derech is masculine), where war is being referred to [because it is the way of men to make war and not the way of women to make war], (derech is) written as a masculine word. ","(Between) one mishna and the other (there is) no difficulty. Here (in the mishna) that is referring to a woman, is is reasonable that it teaches for her in the feminine language. (Whilst) there (in Zavim) it is referring to a man, [as it is the way of man to examine (himself in this case) and is not the way of women to examine (themselves in this case) as a woman is also made tamei(impure) through an accident] it teaches in the masculine.","What is the reason that it (the mishna) teaches three (in the feminine) ..."],[],[""," "," "," (The mishna said that the woman can be acquired) With money From where do we know this? and also we learnt (in Ketubot 46b)... The father has authority over his daughter with regard to kiddushin (effected) with money, with a document, or with intercourse. From where do we know that one can acquire with money, and (that if money is used to effect kiddushin) that the money is the father's?"],["","    ","  \"and she will go out for free\"; These are the days of Bogerut. \"no money\"; these are the days of Na'arut."," "," ","  ","  ",". ","  ","","(we return to) the body (of the text): \"'And she will go out'; these are the days of bogerut. 'no money'; these are the days of na'arut. The Torah should of only written (regarding) na'arut. Then, (the mention of) Line truncated
				`@@ -0,0 +1 @@`
				{"categories":["Talmud","Bavli","Seder Nashim"],"heTitle":"קידושין","language":"en","license":"CC0","sectionNames":["Daf","Line"],"text":[[],[],["A woman is acquired in three ways and acquires herself in two ways. [She is] acquired through money, a document and relations. Through money: Beit Shammai say [this means] a dinar or the equivalent of a dinar. And Beit Hillel say a pruta or an equivalent of a pruta. How much is a pruta? One eight of an Italian issar. ","She acquires herself through a bill of divorce or if her husband dies. A Yevamah is acquired through relations and acquires herself through halitzah or the death of the Yavam. ","GEMARAH: A woman is acquired What is the difference here that it is written \"a woman is acquired\" and [the later mishna which states] \"the man sanctifies\"? Because the Tanna wanted to write \"money\", and money we have learned by analogy of the verb TAKE לקח - from the field of Ephron.","It is written here (Deut. 22:13) \"when a man takes a woman\" and it is written there (Gen. 23:13) \"I gave the money of the field, take it from me\".","And taking is called acquisition as it is written \"the field which Abraham bought\""],["Also \"fields will be bought with money\" (Jer. 32:44), the Tanna wrote \"the woman is acquired\".","Q: The Tanna should have written there (2:1) \"the man acquires\"? A: first he used biblical language and then rabbinical language. What is the meaning of the rabbinical language? - he makes her forbidden for the whole world, like property of the Temple.","Q: The Tanna should have written here (1:1) \"the man acquires\"? A: He wanted to write at the end \"she acquires herself\", he wrote in the beginning also a reference to herself.","Q: He should have written \"the man acquires and makes the [woman]acquire herself\"? A: Since in the case of the husband's death it is not him, but rather God who makes the wife acquire herself.","Or if you wish you could say If it was written \"[the man] acquires\" I would have thought that it means even against her will, therefore the Tanna wrote \"the woman is acquired\" - with her consent only","and what is the reason it(the mishna) teaches three(in the feminine)? Let it teach three (in the masculine)! Because they wanted to teach the word derech (way) and derech is a feminine word, as is written (in the torah): \"and you shall inform them the way(derech) they shall go upon (literally \"they shall go on her\"). (Exodus 18:20).","But what of that which was learnt (in a baraisa): (The mishna says:) \"In seven(masucline) ways(derachim), the zav is examined\" (Mishna Zavim, chapter 2). Let is teach seven (in the feminine)! (The mishna uses the masculine here) because they want to teach derech and derech is a masculine word, as is written (in the torah): In one way they will go out to you, and in seven (masculine) ways (derachim) they will flee before you. (Devarim 28: 7). (End of beraisa). If so, there is a difficulty between one verse (in torah) and the other, and there is a difficulty also between one mishna and the other.","Between one verse and the other, there is no difficulty. (For) here ( in the verse that was previously used to prove that derech is feminine), where torah is being referred to [and torah is a feminine word, as it says (in tanach): \"the teaching (torah) of Hash-m is perfect, restoring the soul\" (Tehillim 19:8).], (the word derech) is written as a feminine word. (However,) there (in the verse used in the beraisa to prove that derech is masculine), where war is being referred to [because it is the way of men to make war and not the way of women to make war], (derech is) written as a masculine word. ","(Between) one mishna and the other (there is) no difficulty. Here (in the mishna) that is referring to a woman, is is reasonable that it teaches for her in the feminine language. (Whilst) there (in Zavim) it is referring to a man, [as it is the way of man to examine (himself in this case) and is not the way of women to examine (themselves in this case) as a woman is also made tamei(impure) through an accident] it teaches in the masculine.","What is the reason that it (the mishna) teaches three (in the feminine) ..."],[],[""," "," "," (The mishna said that the woman can be acquired) With money From where do we know this? and also we learnt (in Ketubot 46b)... The father has authority over his daughter with regard to kiddushin (effected) with money, with a document, or with intercourse. From where do we know that one can acquire with money, and (that if money is used to effect kiddushin) that the money is the father's?"],[""," "," \"and she will go out for free\"; These are the days of Bogerut. \"no money\"; these are the days of Na'arut."," "," "," "," ",". "," ","","(we return to) the body (of the text): \"'And she will go out'; these are the days of bogerut. 'no money'; these are the days of na'arut. The Torah should of only written (regarding) na'arut. Then, (the mention of) Line truncated