the second scroll: the mesorah snapshot, pinned and read (bishe'arecha step 6)

Devarim 17:18 — the king writes his copy from before the priests, not from memory. scripts/build_mesorah.py takes one open-licence version per work per language from the Sefaria export (bucket sefaria-export, catalogue of 2026-10-02; Public Domain / CC0 / CC-BY / CC-BY-SA only, checked in every file; no CC-BY-NC — the Bavli is Wikisource's) and lays it down beside L1: mesorah/works/<slug>/{he,en}.json, index.json, integrity.sha256, build_report.json. 128 works (Rashi, Onkelos, Ramban, Ibn Ezra, Sforno on the Torah; all of Mishnah; 37 Bavli tractates; Bereshit and Shemot Rabbah, Sifrei, Tanchuma), 256 files, 44.9 MiB, tree hash 7d5b3a6c… computed as L1's (sorted relative path, then bytes; the two post-hash files excluded). What is out, and why (licence), is in Terumah §E5. Read, never fetched: korban_processor/mesorah.py finds citations as written (Rashi on Devarim 6:5, Berakhot 2a, Mishnah Berakhot 1:1, Bereshit Rabbah 1:1, Sifrei Devarim 32, Tanchuma Bereshit 1 …), resolves each against the snapshot (complex works through their unnamed node, Tanchuma by parashah), lists them as examination.mesorah_references, and makes every passage found a given source for that examination — so a claim about Rashi anchors in Rashi or does not. The Vav Pipeline couples coupled(reference(R), mesorah(Work, [Address])) or not_in_mesorah; the engine accepts mesorah/2 as a terminal and not_in_mesorah is Form 4. VavPipeline.Mesorah pins the hash, re-reads the tree at startup and every ten minutes, and /kodesh/health carries mesorah_hash. Mounted read-only at /mnt/mesorah in the vav-pipeline and korban-processor images. L3 bedikot.mesorah (migration 20261013000002). Also: the 1-in-12 Day6 serving failure of 2026-10-04 reproduced with seed 446116 — HaltMonitorTest left the system halted; it now resolves on exit and the Day6 setup is defensive. Construction §3.11, Terumah §E5, Tamid §1.1, bishearecha §IV, KOHEN, AGENTS. Doorpost 0638d4eb…. Elixir 604/0 (seeds 835592 and 446116), korban 294/1 skipped, Prolog bedikah 44/44, L3 10/0. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-13 19:13:36 +00:00
1 parent ffccedb63a
commit 5e325d36cc
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"categories":["Talmud","Bavli","Seder Tahorot"],"heTitle":"נדה","language":"en","license":"CC0","sectionNames":["Daf","Line"],"text":[[],[],["Mishnah: Shammai says, All women, their hour (i.e. the time at which they see menstrual blood) is [a] sufficient (starting point for determining whether the terumot and taharot they handled are ritually impure). Hillel says, From [a more recent] check (where she is found to be ritually impure) to [an earlier] check (where she is found to be ritually pure, all terumot and taharot handled will be retroactively declared impure), and even where there are many days [in between checks].","And the sages say, The law is neither like this (Shammai, who is lenient) nor like this (Hillel, who is stringent). Rather a twenty four hour period can reduce (a longer than twenty four hour period) between two checks, and a period between two checks (that is less than twenty four hours) can reduce a twenty four hour period.","Any woman who has a regular time (i.e. menstrual cycle), her hour (i.e. the time at which she sees menstrual blood) is [a] sufficient (starting point for determining whether the terumot and taharot she handled are ritually impure). And a woman who uses cloths [to perform a check (i.e. bedikah) at the time of intercourse], this counts as a [valid] check (i.e. bedikah) [for the purposes of determining which terumot and taharot are retroactively ritually impure], and [such a check] can reduce a twenty four hour period as well as period of time in between two checks (i.e. bedikot) [that is less than twenty four hours].","What is an example of, \"her hour (i.e. the time at which they see menstrual blood) is [a] sufficient (starting point for determining whether the terumot and taharot they handled are ritually impure)\"? She was sitting on a bed, dealing with taharot (i.e. ritually pure items), and she separates [from the bed and the taharot] and [afterwards] sees [blood], she is ritually impure, and they (the bed and the taharot) are ritually pure.","Even though [the sages] said, that she causes [terumah and taharot] to retroactively become ritually impure for [a maximum of] twenty four hours, she only [begins to] count [days of Niddah impurity] from the time she sees [blood].","Gemarah: What is the reasoning of Shammai? [Shammai] reasons, \"Maintain the woman on her status, and the woman [in our Mishnah] has a status of ritual purity.\" And Hillel [reasons], \"When [we] say 'maintain something on its status', [that] is where it does not have an inherent disqualification. However, a woman"],["since she sees [the blood] from her body, we do not say \"uphold her (status of ritual purity) [based] on her establishment (of being ritually pure to begin with).\"","And how is [the case of our Mishnah] different [from the case] of Mikvah? As we learn in a Mishnah"],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],["As to Reish Lakish, how does he expound Rabby Yohanan's text?  He requires it for the same exposition as that made Rabbi Hannina bar Pappa.  For Rabbi Hannina bar Pappa made the following exposition:  The name of the angel who is in charge of conception is \"Night\", and he takes up a drop and places it in the presence of the Holy One, Blessed is He, saying, \"Sovreign of the Universe, what shall be the fate of this drop?  Shall it produce a strong man or a weak man, a wise man or a fool, a rich man or a poor man?\" Whereas 'wicked' or 'righteous' he does not mention, in agreement with the view of Rabbi Hannina.  For Rabbi Hannina stated:  Everything is in the hands of heaven, except the fear of God, as it says, \"An now Israel, what does the Lord your God require of you, but to fear, etc.\" (Deuteronomy 10:12)"],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],["","   ","  "," ","  ","        ","     ","   ","  ","","Yalta presented blood before Rabbah bar bar Chana, and he declared it impure for her. She then brought it before Rav Yitzchak the son of Rav Yehudah, and he declared it pure for her. "],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],["   "," "," ","    "," ","  ","  "," "," ","    ","   ","        "," "," ","  ","   ","It was taught: Abba Shaul says:  \"I was a burier of corpses and I would observe the corpses' bones: One who drank undiluted wine - its bones were burnt,one who drank mixed wine - its bones were dry,one who drank wine appropriately - its bones were oiled. And all whose drinking exceeded their eating - its bones were burnt, all whose eating exceeded their drinking - its bones were dry, all those whose eating and drinking were appropriate - its bones were oiled.\""],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],["","","","  "," ","   ","  ","","  "," ","   "," ","","  ","  "," "," ","   ","  ","  ","And it [the foetus] is taught the entire Torah, as it is said: (Proverbs 4:4) \"He instructed me, and said to me, 'Let your mind hold onto my words; Keep my commandments and you wil live'\", and it is also said (Job 29:4) \"When the company (lit. \"sod\", secret) of God was oLine truncated
				`@@ -0,0 +1 @@`
				{"categories":["Talmud","Bavli","Seder Tahorot"],"heTitle":"נדה","language":"en","license":"CC0","sectionNames":["Daf","Line"],"text":[[],[],["Mishnah: Shammai says, All women, their hour (i.e. the time at which they see menstrual blood) is [a] sufficient (starting point for determining whether the terumot and taharot they handled are ritually impure). Hillel says, From [a more recent] check (where she is found to be ritually impure) to [an earlier] check (where she is found to be ritually pure, all terumot and taharot handled will be retroactively declared impure), and even where there are many days [in between checks].","And the sages say, The law is neither like this (Shammai, who is lenient) nor like this (Hillel, who is stringent). Rather a twenty four hour period can reduce (a longer than twenty four hour period) between two checks, and a period between two checks (that is less than twenty four hours) can reduce a twenty four hour period.","Any woman who has a regular time (i.e. menstrual cycle), her hour (i.e. the time at which she sees menstrual blood) is [a] sufficient (starting point for determining whether the terumot and taharot she handled are ritually impure). And a woman who uses cloths [to perform a check (i.e. bedikah) at the time of intercourse], this counts as a [valid] check (i.e. bedikah) [for the purposes of determining which terumot and taharot are retroactively ritually impure], and [such a check] can reduce a twenty four hour period as well as period of time in between two checks (i.e. bedikot) [that is less than twenty four hours].","What is an example of, \"her hour (i.e. the time at which they see menstrual blood) is [a] sufficient (starting point for determining whether the terumot and taharot they handled are ritually impure)\"? She was sitting on a bed, dealing with taharot (i.e. ritually pure items), and she separates [from the bed and the taharot] and [afterwards] sees [blood], she is ritually impure, and they (the bed and the taharot) are ritually pure.","Even though [the sages] said, that she causes [terumah and taharot] to retroactively become ritually impure for [a maximum of] twenty four hours, she only [begins to] count [days of Niddah impurity] from the time she sees [blood].","Gemarah: What is the reasoning of Shammai? [Shammai] reasons, \"Maintain the woman on her status, and the woman [in our Mishnah] has a status of ritual purity.\" And Hillel [reasons], \"When [we] say 'maintain something on its status', [that] is where it does not have an inherent disqualification. However, a woman"],["since she sees [the blood] from her body, we do not say \"uphold her (status of ritual purity) [based] on her establishment (of being ritually pure to begin with).\"","And how is [the case of our Mishnah] different [from the case] of Mikvah? As we learn in a Mishnah"],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],["As to Reish Lakish, how does he expound Rabby Yohanan's text? He requires it for the same exposition as that made Rabbi Hannina bar Pappa. For Rabbi Hannina bar Pappa made the following exposition: The name of the angel who is in charge of conception is \"Night\", and he takes up a drop and places it in the presence of the Holy One, Blessed is He, saying, \"Sovreign of the Universe, what shall be the fate of this drop? Shall it produce a strong man or a weak man, a wise man or a fool, a rich man or a poor man?\" Whereas 'wicked' or 'righteous' he does not mention, in agreement with the view of Rabbi Hannina. For Rabbi Hannina stated: Everything is in the hands of heaven, except the fear of God, as it says, \"An now Israel, what does the Lord your God require of you, but to fear, etc.\" (Deuteronomy 10:12)"],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[""," "," "," "," "," "," "," "," ","","Yalta presented blood before Rabbah bar bar Chana, and he declared it impure for her. She then brought it before Rav Yitzchak the son of Rav Yehudah, and he declared it pure for her. "],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[" "," "," "," "," "," "," "," "," "," "," "," "," "," "," "," ","It was taught: Abba Shaul says: \"I was a burier of corpses and I would observe the corpses' bones: One who drank undiluted wine - its bones were burnt,one who drank mixed wine - its bones were dry,one who drank wine appropriately - its bones were oiled. And all whose drinking exceeded their eating - its bones were burnt, all whose eating exceeded their drinking - its bones were dry, all those whose eating and drinking were appropriate - its bones were oiled.\""],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],["","",""," "," "," "," ",""," "," "," "," ",""," "," "," "," "," "," "," ","And it [the foetus] is taught the entire Torah, as it is said: (Proverbs 4:4) \"He instructed me, and said to me, 'Let your mind hold onto my words; Keep my commandments and you wil live'\", and it is also said (Job 29:4) \"When the company (lit. \"sod\", secret) of God was oLine truncated