the second scroll: the mesorah snapshot, pinned and read (bishe'arecha step 6)

Devarim 17:18 — the king writes his copy from before the priests, not from memory. scripts/build_mesorah.py takes one open-licence version per work per language from the Sefaria export (bucket sefaria-export, catalogue of 2026-10-02; Public Domain / CC0 / CC-BY / CC-BY-SA only, checked in every file; no CC-BY-NC — the Bavli is Wikisource's) and lays it down beside L1: mesorah/works/<slug>/{he,en}.json, index.json, integrity.sha256, build_report.json. 128 works (Rashi, Onkelos, Ramban, Ibn Ezra, Sforno on the Torah; all of Mishnah; 37 Bavli tractates; Bereshit and Shemot Rabbah, Sifrei, Tanchuma), 256 files, 44.9 MiB, tree hash 7d5b3a6c… computed as L1's (sorted relative path, then bytes; the two post-hash files excluded). What is out, and why (licence), is in Terumah §E5. Read, never fetched: korban_processor/mesorah.py finds citations as written (Rashi on Devarim 6:5, Berakhot 2a, Mishnah Berakhot 1:1, Bereshit Rabbah 1:1, Sifrei Devarim 32, Tanchuma Bereshit 1 …), resolves each against the snapshot (complex works through their unnamed node, Tanchuma by parashah), lists them as examination.mesorah_references, and makes every passage found a given source for that examination — so a claim about Rashi anchors in Rashi or does not. The Vav Pipeline couples coupled(reference(R), mesorah(Work, [Address])) or not_in_mesorah; the engine accepts mesorah/2 as a terminal and not_in_mesorah is Form 4. VavPipeline.Mesorah pins the hash, re-reads the tree at startup and every ten minutes, and /kodesh/health carries mesorah_hash. Mounted read-only at /mnt/mesorah in the vav-pipeline and korban-processor images. L3 bedikot.mesorah (migration 20261013000002). Also: the 1-in-12 Day6 serving failure of 2026-10-04 reproduced with seed 446116 — HaltMonitorTest left the system halted; it now resolves on exit and the Day6 setup is defensive. Construction §3.11, Terumah §E5, Tamid §1.1, bishearecha §IV, KOHEN, AGENTS. Doorpost 0638d4eb…. Elixir 604/0 (seeds 835592 and 446116), korban 294/1 skipped, Prolog bedikah 44/44, L3 10/0. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-13 19:13:36 +00:00
1 parent ffccedb63a
commit 5e325d36cc
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"categories":["Mishnah","Seder Kodashim"],"heTitle":"משנה מנחות","language":"en","license":"CC0","sectionNames":["Chapter","Mishnah"],"text":[["All grain offerings from which handfuls were taken not for their own sake are valid, but they do not fulfill the obligation of their owners. [This is true] except for the grain offering of a sinner or the grain offering brought out of jealousy [by the suspected adulteress]. The grain offerings of a sinner and of jealousy from which handfuls were collected not for their own sake, or that were put into a vessel, or that were brought [to the altar], or were burned not for their own sake, or one [action was done] for their own sake and the other not or their own sake, or one [action was done] not for their own sake and one [was done] for their own sake, they are invalid. What [is meant by]  [\"an action done] for their own sake and [one done] not for their own sake?\" For the sake of the grain offering of the sinner and for the sake of the voluntary grain offering. [And what is meant by \"an action done] not for their own sake and [one done] for their own sake\"? With the intent of a voluntary grain offering  and with the intent of a grain offering of a sinner.","The grain offering of a sinner and the grain offerings from which handfuls were taken by a non-priest, by a person in mourning [for a kinsman who has not yet been buried], by a <i>tevul yom</i> [a person who has immersed himself that day to purify himself, but who must wait for night-fall to be fully pure], by a person who lacks [priestly] garments, by a <i>mechusar kippurim</i> [a person who is required to bring an atonement offering before partaking in an offering], by a person with unwashed hands and feet, by an uncircumcised man, by an impure person, by a person who is sitting, or one who is standing on vessels, an animal, or his friend's legs - these [offerings] are invalid. If he took the handful with his left [hand], it [the offering] is invalid. Ben Betera says: he should return it and take the handful again with his right. If he took the handful, and a stone or a chunk of salt or a remnant of frankincense came with it in his hand, it is invalid, because they said: one who takes too much or too little [as] the handful, it is invalid. What is too much? If he took a heaping handful. And too little? If he took the handful with his fingertips. How should he do it? Extend his fingers on his palm [and bring the flour with his three middle fingers into his palm]. ","If he used too much oil or too little  oil or too little  frankincense, it is invalid. One who takes a handful from the grain offering [intending] to eat the remainder [of the offering] outside [the Temple] or an olive’s bulk outside; Or to burn the handful or an olive’s bulk of the fistful outside; or  to burn its frankincense outside, it is invalid, but it does not entail <i>karet</i> [divinely imposed punishment consisting of death at an early age without progeny]. [One who takes a handful from the grain offering intending] to eat the remainder the next day or an olive’s bulk the next day; or  to burn the fistful the next day or an olive’s bulk of the handful  the next day; or to burn its frankincense the next day,  It is <i>piggul</i> [a sacrifice that becomes unfit due to the intention of the officiating priest to consume it outside of its permitted time], and they would be liable for <i>karet</i> [divinely imposed punishment consisting of death at an early age without progeny].   This is the general rule: anyone who takes the fistful, or puts it into a vessel, or carries it to the altar, or burns it, [intending] to eat [the amount] which is normally eaten, or to burn [the amount] which is normally burned: outside its prescribed place [the Temple courtyard], [the minhah] is invalid, but it does not result in <i>karet</i>; after its designated time, it is <i>piggul</i> [a sacrifice unfit due to the intention to consume it outside of its permitted time] and it results in <i>karet</i>, provided that the [portion which] permits is offered as required. How is the [portion which] permits offered as required\"?  If one took the handful in silence [i.e., without express intention], and put it in a vessel and carried it, and burned it, [intending to eat it] after its designated time;  Or if one took the handful [intending to eat the grain-offering] after its designated time, and put it in a vessel, and carried it and burned it in silence, or if one took the handful and put it in a vessel, carried it out, and burned it [intending to eat the grain-offering] after its designated time. This is offering the [portion which] permits as is required.  ","How is the [portion which] permits not offered as is required?  If one took the handful [intending to eat it] outside the designated place, [and] put it in a vessel, carried it to the altar, and burned it [with the intention of eating it] after its designated time;  Or if one took the handfulLine truncated
				`@@ -0,0 +1 @@`
				{"categories":["Mishnah","Seder Kodashim"],"heTitle":"משנה מנחות","language":"en","license":"CC0","sectionNames":["Chapter","Mishnah"],"text":[["All grain offerings from which handfuls were taken not for their own sake are valid, but they do not fulfill the obligation of their owners. [This is true] except for the grain offering of a sinner or the grain offering brought out of jealousy [by the suspected adulteress]. The grain offerings of a sinner and of jealousy from which handfuls were collected not for their own sake, or that were put into a vessel, or that were brought [to the altar], or were burned not for their own sake, or one [action was done] for their own sake and the other not or their own sake, or one [action was done] not for their own sake and one [was done] for their own sake, they are invalid. What [is meant by] [\"an action done] for their own sake and [one done] not for their own sake?\" For the sake of the grain offering of the sinner and for the sake of the voluntary grain offering. [And what is meant by \"an action done] not for their own sake and [one done] for their own sake\"? With the intent of a voluntary grain offering and with the intent of a grain offering of a sinner.","The grain offering of a sinner and the grain offerings from which handfuls were taken by a non-priest, by a person in mourning [for a kinsman who has not yet been buried], by a <i>tevul yom</i> [a person who has immersed himself that day to purify himself, but who must wait for night-fall to be fully pure], by a person who lacks [priestly] garments, by a <i>mechusar kippurim</i> [a person who is required to bring an atonement offering before partaking in an offering], by a person with unwashed hands and feet, by an uncircumcised man, by an impure person, by a person who is sitting, or one who is standing on vessels, an animal, or his friend's legs - these [offerings] are invalid. If he took the handful with his left [hand], it [the offering] is invalid. Ben Betera says: he should return it and take the handful again with his right. If he took the handful, and a stone or a chunk of salt or a remnant of frankincense came with it in his hand, it is invalid, because they said: one who takes too much or too little [as] the handful, it is invalid. What is too much? If he took a heaping handful. And too little? If he took the handful with his fingertips. How should he do it? Extend his fingers on his palm [and bring the flour with his three middle fingers into his palm]. ","If he used too much oil or too little oil or too little frankincense, it is invalid. One who takes a handful from the grain offering [intending] to eat the remainder [of the offering] outside [the Temple] or an olive’s bulk outside; Or to burn the handful or an olive’s bulk of the fistful outside; or to burn its frankincense outside, it is invalid, but it does not entail <i>karet</i> [divinely imposed punishment consisting of death at an early age without progeny]. [One who takes a handful from the grain offering intending] to eat the remainder the next day or an olive’s bulk the next day; or to burn the fistful the next day or an olive’s bulk of the handful the next day; or to burn its frankincense the next day, It is <i>piggul</i> [a sacrifice that becomes unfit due to the intention of the officiating priest to consume it outside of its permitted time], and they would be liable for <i>karet</i> [divinely imposed punishment consisting of death at an early age without progeny]. This is the general rule: anyone who takes the fistful, or puts it into a vessel, or carries it to the altar, or burns it, [intending] to eat [the amount] which is normally eaten, or to burn [the amount] which is normally burned: outside its prescribed place [the Temple courtyard], [the minhah] is invalid, but it does not result in <i>karet</i>; after its designated time, it is <i>piggul</i> [a sacrifice unfit due to the intention to consume it outside of its permitted time] and it results in <i>karet</i>, provided that the [portion which] permits is offered as required. How is the [portion which] permits offered as required\"? If one took the handful in silence [i.e., without express intention], and put it in a vessel and carried it, and burned it, [intending to eat it] after its designated time; Or if one took the handful [intending to eat the grain-offering] after its designated time, and put it in a vessel, and carried it and burned it in silence, or if one took the handful and put it in a vessel, carried it out, and burned it [intending to eat the grain-offering] after its designated time. This is offering the [portion which] permits as is required. ","How is the [portion which] permits not offered as is required? If one took the handful [intending to eat it] outside the designated place, [and] put it in a vessel, carried it to the altar, and burned it [with the intention of eating it] after its designated time; Or if one took the handfulLine truncated