the second scroll: the mesorah snapshot, pinned and read (bishe'arecha step 6)

Devarim 17:18 — the king writes his copy from before the priests, not from
memory. scripts/build_mesorah.py takes one open-licence version per work
per language from the Sefaria export (bucket sefaria-export, catalogue of
2026-10-02; Public Domain / CC0 / CC-BY / CC-BY-SA only, checked in every
file; no CC-BY-NC — the Bavli is Wikisource's) and lays it down beside
L1: mesorah/works/<slug>/{he,en}.json, index.json, integrity.sha256,
build_report.json. 128 works (Rashi, Onkelos, Ramban, Ibn Ezra, Sforno
on the Torah; all of Mishnah; 37 Bavli tractates; Bereshit and Shemot
Rabbah, Sifrei, Tanchuma), 256 files, 44.9 MiB, tree hash 7d5b3a6c…
computed as L1's (sorted relative path, then bytes; the two post-hash
files excluded). What is out, and why (licence), is in Terumah §E5.

Read, never fetched: korban_processor/mesorah.py finds citations as
written (Rashi on Devarim 6:5, Berakhot 2a, Mishnah Berakhot 1:1,
Bereshit Rabbah 1:1, Sifrei Devarim 32, Tanchuma Bereshit 1 …), resolves
each against the snapshot (complex works through their unnamed node,
Tanchuma by parashah), lists them as examination.mesorah_references, and
makes every passage found a given source for that examination — so a
claim about Rashi anchors in Rashi or does not. The Vav Pipeline couples
coupled(reference(R), mesorah(Work, [Address])) or not_in_mesorah; the
engine accepts mesorah/2 as a terminal and not_in_mesorah is Form 4.
VavPipeline.Mesorah pins the hash, re-reads the tree at startup and every
ten minutes, and /kodesh/health carries mesorah_hash. Mounted read-only at
/mnt/mesorah in the vav-pipeline and korban-processor images. L3
bedikot.mesorah (migration 20261013000002).

Also: the 1-in-12 Day6 serving failure of 2026-10-04 reproduced with seed
446116 — HaltMonitorTest left the system halted; it now resolves on exit
and the Day6 setup is defensive. Construction §3.11, Terumah §E5, Tamid
§1.1, bishearecha §IV, KOHEN, AGENTS. Doorpost 0638d4eb…. Elixir 604/0
(seeds 835592 and 446116), korban 294/1 skipped, Prolog bedikah 44/44,
L3 10/0.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Scott KarpandClaude Fable 5.1 committed 2026-10-13 19:13:36 +00:00
1 parent ffccedb63a
commit 5e325d36cc
288 files changed
+8809 -10

No files matched your search

+1
View File
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
{"categories":["Mishnah","Seder Nashim"],"heTitle":"משנה יבמות","language":"en","license":"Public Domain","sectionNames":["Chapter","Mishnah"],"text":[["Fifteen classes of women exempt their rivals and their rivals' rivals <i>ad infinitum</i> from <i>Chalitzah</i> [the ceremony releasing the widow of a childless man from the obligation of Levirate marriage] and <i>Yibum</i> [Levirate marriage wherein a man weds his childless brother's widow]. And these are they: His [the <i>Yavam</i> - the surviving brother's] daughter, and his daughter's daughter, and his son's daughter, and his wife's daughter, and her [his wife's] son's daughter, and her [his wife's] daughter's daughter, and his mother-in-law, and his mother-in-law's mother, and his father-in-law's mother, and his maternal sister, and his mother's sister, and his wife's sister, and his maternal brother's wife, and the wife of his brother who was not alive [when the younger brother lived], and his daughter-in-law. These exempt their rivals and their rivals' rivals from <i>Chalitzah</i> and from <i>Yibum</i> <i>ad infinitum</i>. [If] any of these [women] died, or refused [as adults to remain in marriages they were forced into as minors], or were divorced, or were found to be barren, their rivals are permitted [to the <i>Yavam</i>]. But regarding his mother-in-law, and his mother-in-law's mother, and his father-in-law's mother you cannot say that they were found to be barren or that they refused. ","How do they [these women] exempt their rivals? [If] one's daughter or any one of these forbidden unions was married to his brother who had another wife, and he died - then just like his daughter is exempt [from <i>Yibum</i> because one cannot marry one's daughter], so too is her rival exempt. [If] his daughter's rival went and married his second brother who had another wife and then he [the second brother] died - then just like his daughter's rival is exempt [from <i>Yibum</i>] so too is her rival's rival exempt, even if there are a hundred [brothers]. How is it to be understood that when these have died their rivals are permitted? [If] one's daughter, or any one of these forbidden unions was married to his brother who had another wife, and his daughter died, or was divorced, and subsequently his brother died, her rival is permitted. And [if] a woman could have refused but did not refuse, her rival performs <i>Chalitzah</i> but does not undergo <i>Yibum</i>.","[There are] six forbidden unions [whose cases are] more stringent than these, because they are married to others their rivals are permitted. His mother, and his father's wife, and his father's sister, and his paternal sister, and his father's brother's wife, and his paternal brother's wife.","Beit Shammai permit the rivals to the brothers [for marriage], but Beit Hillel forbid [them]. [If these women] had performed <i>Chalitzah</i> Beit Shammai disqualify them from [subsequently marrying] priests, but Beit Hillel allow them [to do so]. [If these women] had undergone <i>Yibum</i>, Beit Shammai permit them [to subsequently marry priests], but Beit Hillel disqualify them [from such a union]. Even though these [one school] prohibit and these [the other school] permit, these disqualify and these allow, Beit Shammai did not refrain from marrying women from Beit Hillel, nor did Beit Hillel [refrain from marrying women] from Beit Shammai. [With regard to] purity and impurity where these ruled [a matter] pure and these ruled [it] impure, they did not refrain from using [utensils] the other deemed pure. "],["How [does] the wife of his brother who was not alive [release her rival]? [If there were] two brothers and one dies [childless] and [a third] brother was born to them, following which the second brother performs <i>Yibum</i> [Levirate marriage wherein a man weds his childless brother's widow] for his brother's wife and dies, then the first woman [the initial widow] goes out [without <i>Yibum</i> or <i>Chalitzah</i> - the ceremony releasing the widow of a childless man from the obligation of Levirate marriage] because she was the wife of his brother who was not alive [when the younger brother lived]; and the second [wife of the second brother is also exempt] because of her rival [the initial widow]. [If] he [the second brother] performed <i>Ma’amar</i> [semi-betrothal of a <i>Yevama</i> through money or a document] and died, the second [wife of the second brother] performs <i>Chalitzah</i> but does not undergo <i>Yibum</i>.","[If there were] two brothers and one of them dies, and the second performs <i>Yibum</i> for his brother's wife, whereupon another [third] brother was born, and [the second brother] dies - the first [widow] goes out [without further ceremony] because she was the wife of his brother who was not alive, and the second [widow of the second brother goes out] since she is her [the initial widow's] rival. [If] he [the second brother] performed <i>Ma’amar</i> [for the initial widLine truncated