Eish zarah actionable items: coupling trace, grounding type, self-grounding detection, golden calf halt
Torah grounds each change: 1. interpret.pl — coupling_trace field (Vayikra 10:1, 6:6) Fire is zarah because "asher lo tzivah otam" — the coupling trace IS the tzivah trace. Records which L1 facts grounded each interpretation. 2. challenge.pl — grounding_type achorai/panim (Shemot 33:23) "You will see My back, but My face shall not be seen." Text-backed challenges = achorai. Inferred challenges = panim. 3. resolve.pl — self-grounding detection (eish_zarah_reading §5.3) Counter-interpretation must bring NEW L1 evidence. Prevents circular reasoning (Westworld problem). 4. teiku.pl — challenge_sequence in teiku_record Records diagnostic trail to impasse, not just verdict. 5. avodah_zarah.pl — Form 2: golden calf detection (Shemot 32:4) Empty coupling trace + non-low confidence = uncoupled output. Real gold, sincere worship, false god. 6. korban.py — pydantic BaseModel + raw_korban preservation Construction spec §1.4 fulfilled. Floor between input and output never severed. 490 tests, 0 failures (195 Prolog, 186 Python, 33 Haskell, 76 Elixir). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
c5fe82477b
commit
adc3e41679
12 files changed
+371
-65
No files matched your search
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ process_request(request(halt_check, Action), Response) :-
|
||||
%% ============================================================
|
||||
|
||||
%% Format an interpretation as a response
|
||||
format_interpretation(interpretation(Ref, Mitzvot, Verses, Reading, Confidence),
|
||||
format_interpretation(interpretation(Ref, Mitzvot, Verses, Reading, Confidence, _CouplingTrace),
|
||||
response(ok, interpreted,
|
||||
result(ref(Ref),
|
||||
mitzvot(Mitzvot),
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user