tablet 55, fourth: the engine answers the whole dialectic over the wire

Live after vav :4bffa01e the judges consulted with roots the engine
could read — interpret found 4 mitzvot and 11 verses for bereishit 1:1
— and the other two seats still said teiku. The engine had no
"challenge" action at all (process_json_line failed and the socket
fell silent), and a resolve that SUCCEEDED came back
UNEXPECTED_RESPONSE because response(ok, resolved_accepted, ...) had
no JSON clause. Both pre-existing; both invisible until a judge asked.

- api.pl: request(challenge, ...) — interpret, then a kushya against
  it → resolved_challenged with the kushya; none → no_challenge with
  the reading.
- json_bridge.pl: interpreted | resolved_accepted | no_challenge share
  the "resolved" JSON; resolved_challenged now carries the
  interpretation's verses and mitzvot (a judge rejecting on the kushya
  cites its ground); resolved_synthesized and no_interpretation gain
  clauses.
- reasoning_test.pl: dialectic_over_the_wire — all three actions
  answer; no roots → resolved on an empty trace (the judge abstains).

Prolog: 7 suites green (bedikah 45, halt 49, middot 47, mitzvot 42,
phase3 28, reasoning 18, tzaraat 34). Local probe: interpret /
challenge / resolve each → resolved, 11 verses, 4 mitzvot.

Live proof waits for tomorrow's manna: today's five panels were all
spent on verification (503 MANNA_DEPLETED, as specified).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>

talmudic_engine/src/interface/json_bridge.pl

@@ -153,11 +153,15 @@ read_coupling_term(Str, Term) :-
 %% JSON format (Construction §3.3):
 %%   { "status": "resolved", "interpretation": { ... } }
 
-%% Interpreted response
-response_to_json(response(ok, interpreted, result(ref(Ref), mitzvot(Mitzvot),
-                                                   verses(Verses), reading(Reading),
-                                                   confidence(Conf))),
+%% Interpreted response — and the same shape under the names the
+%% resolve and challenge steps give it when the reading stands
+%% (tablet 55: resolved_accepted had no clause, so a resolve that
+%% succeeded came back UNEXPECTED_RESPONSE; no_challenge is new).
+response_to_json(response(ok, Kind, result(ref(Ref), mitzvot(Mitzvot),
+                                            verses(Verses), reading(Reading),
+                                            confidence(Conf))),
                  Dict) :-
+    memberchk(Kind, [interpreted, resolved_accepted, no_challenge]),
     maplist(term_to_string, Mitzvot, MitzvotStrs),
     maplist(term_to_string, Verses, VerseStrs),
     term_to_string(Reading, ReadingStr),
@@ -171,21 +175,52 @@ response_to_json(response(ok, interpreted, result(ref(Ref), mitzvot(Mitzvot),
                                      confidence: ConfStr},
                 challenge: null}.
 
-%% Challenged response
+%% Challenged response — the interpretation's verses and mitzvot are
+%% carried, so a judge rejecting on the kushya still cites its ground.
 response_to_json(response(ok, resolved_challenged,
                           result(interpretation(Interp), challenge(Kushya))),
                  Dict) :-
+    Interp = interpretation(_Ref, Mitzvot, Verses, _Reading, _Conf, _Trace),
+    maplist(term_to_string, Mitzvot, MitzvotStrs),
+    maplist(term_to_string, Verses, VerseStrs),
     term_to_string(Interp, InterpStr),
     term_to_string(Kushya, KushyaStr),
     Dict = json{status: "challenged",
                 interpretation: json{text: InterpStr,
                                      prolog_form: InterpStr,
-                                     grounding: [],
+                                     grounding: MitzvotStrs,
+                                     verses: VerseStrs,
                                      confidence: "medium"},
                 challenge: json{kushya: KushyaStr,
                                 contradicting: "",
                                 strength: "moderate"}}.
 
+%% Synthesized resolution: both readings stand on common ground.
+response_to_json(response(ok, resolved_synthesized,
+                          result(common(Common), verses(Verses), both_sides(Both))),
+                 Dict) :-
+    maplist(term_to_string, Common, CommonStrs),
+    maplist(term_to_string, Verses, VerseStrs),
+    term_to_string(Both, BothStr),
+    Dict = json{status: "resolved",
+                interpretation: json{text: BothStr,
+                                     prolog_form: BothStr,
+                                     grounding: CommonStrs,
+                                     verses: VerseStrs,
+                                     confidence: "medium"},
+                challenge: null}.
+
+%% No interpretation possible (from resolve)
+response_to_json(response(ok, no_interpretation, result(ref(Ref))), Dict) :-
+    atom_string(Ref, RefStr),
+    Dict = json{status: "teiku",
+                interpretation: json{text: "No interpretation found",
+                                     prolog_form: RefStr,
+                                     grounding: [],
+                                     verses: [],
+                                     confidence: "low"},
+                challenge: null}.
+
 %% Teiku response
 response_to_json(response(ok, teiku, result(record(Record))), Dict) :-
     term_to_string(Record, RecordStr),