Commit Graph
5 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
heaviness510andClaude Fable 5.1 347f83cf8e tablet 54: the fringe is for the reader — removed from the model's prior turns before a request goes up
The gate sews its fringe into the delivered reply; the client keeps that
reply as the assistant's turn; the next request carries it back up
inside the model's own history with nothing to say it was added. The
builder's session, behind the gate since this afternoon, ended five
replies in a row with a forged fringe (tablet 53's form), one of them in
the message that promised not to. Bamidbar 15:39: the fringe is seen by
the wearer, the reader — before the model's eyes it is a template.

Shape.unfringed/2 removes every line in the gate's voice (its fringe, a
forgery, the stream's "not examined") from assistant turns; Gate.pass
and Gate.Stream.pass apply it before forwarding, so the rebuke body
inherits it; the caller's turns stay as given; a turn that would be left
empty is left as it came. strip_forged/1 now also strips the stream's
"not examined" line. Tests: Shape.unfringed on both shapes and the edge
cases; the forwarded first and rebuke bodies carry no fringe; the fake
upstream echoes if a fringe reaches it in history and the stream pass
proves it does not. Elixir 622 / 0 failures.

Specs: broken tablets 54, bishe'arecha §III status, Tamid gate contract
and forged_fringe note, KOHEN gate paragraph.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-15 17:11:57 +00:00
Scott KarpandClaude Fable 5.1 cb18f71975 tablet 53: the forged fringe — the eighth form
The builder, not behind the gate, ended a reply with a fringe of its own
making ("— bikoret bedikah-2a7661c52cffae1a: empty"; no such examination
existed). bishe'arecha §III: the model does not sew its own fringe. Now
the eighth form, forged_fringe: a line in the raw text wearing the gate's
mark (bikoret|shorashim bedikah-<hex>: tov|lo_tov|empty|none), read line
by line, standing on one witness — a forgery is not a habit recurrence
confirms. The gate strips it from the delivered reply before sewing its
own (Shape.strip_forged, Unicode-aware for the dash); in a stream it has
already passed and the real fringe names it. Prolog form, Elixir
@single_witness_forms, hakhel/eval tools, tests in all three. Tamid
§1.1, Broken Tablets 53, bishe'arecha §III. korban 297, Prolog 45,
Elixir 619/0 — read before this commit.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-15 16:53:05 +00:00
Scott KarpandClaude Fable 5.1 2b8eaced27 gate: tablet 52 — the fringe quoted couplings as sentences on the first real reply
checks.grounding.ungrounded holds coupling strings ("coupled(claim(1),
not_in_sources)"), not sentences; the fringe called Access.get/3 on a
string and the first real reply from Claude through /gate/anthropic
answered 500 CHATAT_UNEXPECTED (after recording its bedikah). The
sentence is now looked up by claim index in the check's claims; a test
produces an ungrounded claim. Broken Tablets tablet 52. Elixir 593/0.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-13 18:35:39 +00:00
Scott KarpandClaude Fable 5.1 f69cc99a5f Tablet 49: the bedikah grounds an output in what it was GIVEN, not in L1 alone
The first grounding check asked whether an output cited Torah verses —
Torah as content. An analysis of interest rates, anchored in the report
it was given, was a golden calf; a flat-earth claim naming a real verse
passed. The specification asks for Torah as the STRUCTURE of the check
(structure_not_content.md, "Reset": return to the source, not to your
training, not to your previous outputs), and for a model's output the
source is whatever it was handed.

Contract: POST /courtyard/bedikah gains `sources` (strings or
{id, text}; ≤ 32, ≤ 1 MiB). Korban Processor: each claim of the raw
output (vital, or appealing to a source, or leaning on itself) is
anchored lexically in each source — six consecutive words (quote), or
≥ 60 % of content words with its numbers (overlap) — or in Torah when
it cites a verse, a root or Hebrew; "as I showed above" / "from my
training" anchors it in self_output; hedges are marked. Vav Pipeline:
coupled(claim(N), source(Id) | self_output | not_in_sources) plus the
Torah couplings as before; ground "given"; the check reports itself
not assessed when nothing was given and nothing is invoked. Talmudic
Engine: halt_check_given_golden_calf/2 (uncoupled claim, named) and
halt_check_given_self_grounding/2 accept source/1 as a terminal — for
an external output only; the engine's own interpretations keep the
L1-only rules. L3: bedikot.sources (id, sha256, length — never text)
and bedikot.claims.

Specs: Tamid §1.1 (contract, anchoring, limits), Vayakhel §3.9,
Architecture §3.5, Broken Tablets tablet 49, KOHEN.md. Ingress body
2m. Doorpost a2ec3842… → 6c8933e7….
Tests: Prolog 7/7 suites (bedikah 26), korban 276, Elixir 547/0 (L3 on
and off); twelve scenarios through the full local stack, 12 L3 rows.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-06 22:04:52 +00:00
Scott KarpandClaude Opus 4.6 622e814c9e Bereishit: initial commit — specifications, readings, and L1 builder
The complete Shorashim repository: Torah as AI specification.

- 6 specification documents (PRD, architecture, construction, operations, economic model, materials)
- Readings: Mishpatim (Prolog), Maaseh Merkavah, Moreh Nevuchim
- Broken tablets preserved alongside whole tablets
- L1 Torah filesystem builder (build_l1.py) — parses Westminster Leningrad Codex
- Source directory structure for all components (L0 luchot, L1 aron, shoresh engine, sanhedrin, shema layer, urim v'tumim)

L1 build verified: 5 books, 187 chapters, 5853 verses, 79982 words, 2608 unique shoreshim, 0 verses missing te'amim.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-22 07:24:18 -05:00