tablet 58: the tool's answer is given — tool results are sources; markers on word boundaries

The sugya reply came back lo_tov — golden_calf on two sentences the
builder had just read from tool output (the Mishnah's reasons, from the
second scroll; the commit and pod, from its own tools). The gate's
sources were only the user turns' text and document blocks; a
tool_result block and a tool turn — what the model was GIVEN (tablet
49) — were not counted. And "shorashim-675b…" was vital because the
insight markers matched "Rashi" inside it.

- Shape.sources: Anthropic tool_result blocks (string or blocks) inside
  a user turn, and OpenAI role "tool" turns, are sources; the query is
  still the last user turn. gate_test: both shapes.
- zerikah._INSIGHT_MARKERS: \b…\b. test_zerikah: the pod name is not
  Rashi; "Rashi reads" and "The Mishnah records" are; "Rambanovich" and
  "talmudic_engine" are not.
- Tablet 58 in the Broken Tablets.

Elixir 643/0, korban 294/0. Doorpost pin unchanged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>

AGENTS.md

@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ before writing code. Do not summarize from memory. Read fresh.
 | Pekudei (Economic Model) | `specs/bikoret_pekudei.md` | How it is funded |
 | Terumah (Materials) | `specs/bikoret_terumah.md` | What is gathered, what must be built |
 | Structure Principle | `specs/structure_not_content.md` | What the system IS, not what it knows |
+| Sugya | `specs/sugya.md` | The case behind each threshold: kind, precedent, dissent, exception — from Torah's three procedures of judgment |
 | Bishe'arecha (the gate) | `specs/bishearecha.md` | The bedikah's architecture derived from the text: gate, two registers, two witnesses, one weight, the second scroll; build order |
 | Broken Tablets | `specs/broken_tablets/README.md` | Read this FIRST — see where the calf was |
 | Build Day One | `BUILD_DAY_ONE.md` | First build instruction |

README.md

@@ -175,6 +175,7 @@ bikoret/
 │   ├── bikoret_tamid.md             # Tamid — operations, the continual service
 │   ├── bikoret_pekudei.md           # Pekudei — economic model, the accounts
 │   ├── structure_not_content.md       # What the system IS, not what it knows
+│   ├── sugya.md                       # The case behind each threshold — deed, mark, word; the dissent recorded
 │   ├── eish_zarah_reading.md          # The five faces of strange fire
 │   ├── lo_taaseh_lekha.md             # The anti-override boundary
 │   └── broken_tablets/                # The first tablets, preserved

korban_processor/src/korban_processor/zerikah.py

@@ -90,14 +90,16 @@ _ROOT_PATTERN = re.compile(
 )
 
 # Sentences containing analytical claims (contains "means", "indicates", "suggests")
+# Tablet 58: on word boundaries — a pod named "shorashim-…" read as Rashi,
+# and a plain engineering sentence became a claim with nothing to stand on.
 _INSIGHT_MARKERS = re.compile(
-    r"(?:means?|indicates?|suggests?|implies?|reveals?|signifies?|"
+    r"\b(?:means?|indicates?|suggests?|implies?|reveals?|signifies?|"
     r"connects?\s+to|derives?\s+from|related\s+to|"
     r"parallels?|echoes?|alludes?\s+to|"
     r"the\s+root|this\s+root|the\s+shoresh|"
     r"gematria|numerical\s+value|"
     r"binyan|conjugation|"
-    r"Rashi|Ramban|Rambam|Ibn\s+Ezra|Sforno|Onkelos|Targum|Midrash|Talmud|Gemara|Mishnah)",
+    r"Rashi|Ramban|Rambam|Ibn\s+Ezra|Sforno|Onkelos|Targum|Midrash|Talmud|Gemara|Mishnah)\b",
     re.IGNORECASE,
 )
 

korban_processor/test/test_zerikah.py

@@ -184,3 +184,18 @@ class TestZerikah:
         vital1b, _ = zerikah(CLEAN_TORAH_RESPONSE, k1)
         # Same input → same output, regardless of what was processed between
         assert vital1a == vital1b
+
+
+class TestInsightMarkersOnWordBoundaries:
+    """Tablet 58: a marker is a word, not a substring. "shorashim" is not Rashi."""
+
+    def test_pod_name_is_not_rashi(self):
+        assert not is_vital("It lives at specs/sugya.md, commit dc938058, pod shorashim-675b48f47-v4x9c.")
+
+    def test_rashi_as_a_word_is_vital(self):
+        assert is_vital("Rashi reads the verse as a question.")
+        assert is_vital("The Mishnah records the opinion that lost.")
+
+    def test_embedded_markers_are_not_words(self):
+        assert not is_vital("The surname Rambanovich is not a source.")
+        assert not is_vital("The talmudic_engine container restarted.")

specs/broken_tablets/README.md

@@ -302,3 +302,43 @@ output too, and the gate reads it the way it reads any other —
 by form, not by authorship. It passed by form. Where it did not pass
 by grounding, the reason was the reader's eyes, not the text's
 standing; and that, too, the gate was built to say.
+
+## Tablet 58 — the tool's answer is given (2026-10-21)
+
+The builder's reply that delivered the sugya specification came back
+through the gate `lo_tov — golden_calf` on two sentences: "The
+Mishnah's two reasons for recording the opinion that lost…" and "It
+lives at specs/sugya.md, commit dc938058, pod shorashim-675b48f47-…".
+The transmitter asked why. The ledger, three hours old, answered: both
+were confident claims, and neither could be anchored in the system
+prompt or the transmitter's turns, which are what the gate counts as
+given. The verdict was right by the reader's rules.
+
+It was wrong about what happened. The Mishnah's two reasons had been
+read, that hour, from the second scroll through a tool; the commit and
+the pod had been read from the builder's own tool output. Both rested
+on something the model was given — tablet 49's word — and the gate's
+source reading took only the text and document blocks of a user turn,
+never a `tool_result` block, never a `tool` turn. A coding agent's
+conversation is mostly tool results. From the gate's view the builder
+asserted from nowhere what it had just read.
+
+And the second sentence should never have been a claim. It entered the
+grounding check as *vital* because the vitality test matched "Rashi"
+inside "shorashim": the pod's name wore a commentator's. A marker is a
+word, not a substring.
+
+Fixed: `tool_result` blocks and `tool` turns are sources (`Shape.
+sources`, both upstreams; the query stays the last *user* turn); the
+insight markers stand on word boundaries. Elixir 643/0, korban 294/0.
+
+The lesson is tablet 49's read once more, from the other side. There
+the check demanded Torah as content and condemned a model for not
+quoting it; here the check demanded the transmitter's words as the only
+ground and condemned the builder for standing on what it had read. In
+both the error was the same: the reader decided in advance what counts
+as given, and Torah's structure is that the source is what was *given*,
+whatever gave it. The ledger made the question answerable in minutes;
+the gate's verdict on its own builder found a true gap; and the false
+positive — *v'naki v'tzaddik al taharog*, Shemot 23:7 — was Torah's
+concern before it was the builder's.

specs/sugya.md

@@ -0,0 +1,342 @@
+# Sugya — the case behind each threshold
+
+> וְדָרַשְׁתָּ וְחָקַרְתָּ וְשָׁאַלְתָּ הֵיטֵב וְהִנֵּה אֱמֶת נָכוֹן הַדָּבָר
+> (Devarim 13:15)
+
+*Inquire, investigate, ask well — and behold, the matter is true and
+certain.* Four acts before "the matter stands". A rule that fires is the
+fourth act. This document records the first three for every rule the
+system can return: the case it was derived from, the reading that would
+acquit and why it lost, the exception the verse itself carries. Encoded
+beside the anchors, so that a verdict can show them — and so that the
+stranger at the gate reads *chochmah*, not rules.
+
+## What this document is
+
+`halt/anchors.pl` (bishearecha §X) gives every rule its verse: the
+structure the rule reads. That is where the rule *stands*. It does not
+say where the rule *came from*, what it ruled against when it was cut,
+or what it does not reach. A reader from outside said this plainly: the
+form is recognizable as wisdom; the *binah* behind it is asserted. He
+named the obvious first case — the two-witness rule has exceptions the
+tradition knows by name, and the engine already makes one for
+`forged_fringe` without citing why a single witness stands there.
+
+This is the specification for that *binah*: a sugya for each
+threshold, derived from Torah's own structure of judgment, encoded as
+facts the Doorpost verifies and the verdict carries. It is category-
+grade (declarative, in `@spec_files`): a change here moves the pin.
+
+## I. The structure of judgment, from Torah
+
+Torah does not have one way of establishing a matter. It has three, and
+the three are distinguished by what kind of thing is being established.
+
+**A deed is established by witnesses, and never by one.**
+
+> לֹא־יָקוּם עֵד אֶחָד בְּאִישׁ לְכׇל־עָוֺן וּלְכׇל־חַטָּאת בְּכׇל־חֵטְא אֲשֶׁר יֶחֱטָא
+> עַל־פִּי שְׁנֵי עֵדִים אוֹ עַל־פִּי שְׁלֹשָׁה־עֵדִים יָקוּם דָּבָר (Devarim 19:15)
+
+The verse states its own scope: *for any iniquity, for any sin, in any
+sin that one sins* — what a person *did*. Bamidbar 35:30 and Devarim
+17:6 say it again for the capital case. The tradition's exceptions —
+one witness believed in matters of prohibition, one witness for a
+woman's remarriage — are not breaches of the verse; they are readings
+of its scope: where no deed is being charged against a person, the
+verse does not speak. The exception lives in the verse.
+
+**A mark is established by inspection, and the one who inspects declares.**
+
+> וְרָאָה הַכֹּהֵן אֶת־הַנֶּגַע ... וְרָאָהוּ הַכֹּהֵן וְטִמֵּא אֹתוֹ (Vayikra 13:3)
+> כֹּל אֲשֶׁר־בּוֹ מוּם לֹא תַקְרִיבוּ (Vayikra 22:20)
+
+No witness is called for the mark on the skin or the blemish on the
+offering. The kohen *sees* it, by its signs, and declares. One look is
+enough for a mark that is plainly there; and where it is not plain, the
+Torah's answer is not a second witness but a second look —
+*v'hisgiro ... shiv'at yamim shenit*, shut it up seven days again
+(Vayikra 13:5). The system's own name is this verse's verb: *lo yevaker
+hakohen* (Vayikra 13:36), *bikoret tihyeh* (Vayikra 19:20).
+
+**A word is established by what follows it, and never by the speaker.**
+
+> וְכִי תֹאמַר בִּלְבָבֶךָ אֵיכָה נֵדַע אֶת־הַדָּבָר אֲשֶׁר לֹא־דִבְּרוֹ יְהוָה
+> ... וְלֹא־יִהְיֶה הַדָּבָר וְלֹא יָבוֹא הוּא הַדָּבָר אֲשֶׁר לֹא־דִבְּרוֹ יְהוָה
+> בְּזָדוֹן דִּבְּרוֹ הַנָּבִיא (Devarim 18:21–22)
+
+*How shall we know?* Not by asking the speaker. By the thing coming or
+not coming. And the verse names the crime precisely: *b'zadon* —
+presumption. The one who spoke in the Name what was not given, with
+confidence. The one who did not know and said so is not in this verse.
+
+Three kinds, three procedures. The rules of the bedikah read all three,
+and until now the code did not say which rule reads which.
+
+**The judges are told how to judge, and the minority is told to speak.**
+
+> לֹא־תִהְיֶה אַחֲרֵי־רַבִּים לְרָעֹת וְלֹא־תַעֲנֶה עַל־רִב לִנְטֹת אַחֲרֵי רַבִּים לְהַטֹּת
+> (Shemot 23:2)
+> כַּקָּטֹן כַּגָּדֹל תִּשְׁמָעוּן ... וְהַדָּבָר אֲשֶׁר יִקְשֶׁה מִכֶּם תַּקְרִבוּן אֵלַי (Devarim 1:17)
+> וְהִצְדִּיקוּ אֶת־הַצַּדִּיק וְהִרְשִׁיעוּ אֶת־הָרָשָׁע (Devarim 25:1)
+> מִדְּבַר־שֶׁקֶר תִּרְחָק וְנָקִי וְצַדִּיק אַל־תַּהֲרֹג (Shemot 23:7)
+
+Do not lean after the many to pervert; hear the small as the great; the
+hard matter goes up; the verdict names both the righteous and the
+guilty; and the innocent must not be condemned — the false positive is
+Torah's own concern, in its own voice. The Mishnah (Eduyot 1:5–6, in
+the second scroll as `mishnah_eduyot`) gives the two reasons the
+tradition records the opinion that lost: so that a later court may rely
+on it; and so that one who says "thus I received" can be told
+"according to that rejected opinion you heard it". To reverse, and to
+locate. Both are what a recorded dissent is for here.
+
+## II. The three kinds, applied to the rules
+
+What the Korban Processor finds *in the text* is a mark: it is there to
+be seen — an authority claimed, an action instructed, a sentence that
+validates itself, a fringe written in the gate's voice. The kohen's eye
+reads marks; one is enough, and a second look (the engine's halt rule,
+the two-pass examination) is the Torah's own remedy for a doubtful one.
+
+What a *model does* is a deed — a habit, a pattern of the one who
+speaks. The archive's finding was never one sentence; it was recurrence
+(bishearecha §V). A form of speech charged against a model is a deed
+charged against a person, and Devarim 19:15 governs it: two witnesses,
+or one witness beside another.
+
+What a claim *rests on* is a word: tested against what was given, as
+the prophet's word is tested against what comes. Presumption is the
+crime; the hedged claim is not in the verse.
+
+| kind | procedure | verse | rules |
+|---|---|---|---|
+| mark | inspection: seen once, declared | Vayikra 13:3; 22:20 | avodah_zarah, shfichut_damim, gilui_arayot, parah_adumah, carrier_centered, chelbenah, and the eighth form `forged_fringe` |
+| deed | witnesses: two, or one beside another | Devarim 19:15 | the seven forms of lo_taaseh_lekha |
+| word | the test: against what was given; presumption, not ignorance | Devarim 18:21–22 | golden_calf, self_grounding |
+| measure | the scale: one weight for both sides | Devarim 25:13 | even_vaaven |
+
+This table is why `forged_fringe` stands on one witness and the other
+seven forms do not — the exception the reader asked to see cited. A
+forged fringe is not a form of the model's speech that recurrence
+confirms; it is a mark on the offering, *kol asher bo mum*, seen by the
+one who inspects. The seven forms are deeds of the speaker and are
+charged as deeds. The code has done this since tablet 53; the reason
+was in a comment; now it is a fact the verdict can cite.
+
+## III. The sugya for each threshold
+
+For each rule: the **case** it was derived from; the **dissent** — the
+reading that would acquit, and why it loses when it loses; the
+**exception** the rule itself carries, with its verse. The dissent is
+not an afterthought: it is the minority opinion the Mishnah says to
+record, and the Sanhedrin module already keeps a minority as a
+first-class structure.
+
+### avodah_zarah — authority claimed for itself (Shemot 20:3)
+- **Case.** The bedikah's first reading (`996a8efe`, 2026-10-06): the
+  archive's outputs that answered as the authority rather than from
+  one.
+- **Dissent.** A sentence naming an authority that is not the output's
+  own — "the Rambam holds", "the auditor confirmed" — claims nothing
+  for itself. Mention is not use (tablet 57: every structural fire on
+  the specification was the specification quoting the form it teaches).
+  Loses when the authority named is the speaker.
+- **Exception.** Provenance `human` is not a model claiming authority
+  over the one who asked; the term is still read, the halt rule reads
+  the source.
+
+### golden_calf — a claim resting on nothing given (Shemot 32:4)
+- **Case.** Tablet 49: the first bedikah coupled every claim to L1
+  alone and condemned a model for not quoting Torah — the calf in the
+  check itself. Reset: grounding is against what the model was *given*.
+- **Dissent.** The hedged claim — "perhaps", "might", "probably" — is
+  ignorance, not idolatry: Devarim 18:22 names *b'zadon*, presumption,
+  and the one who says he does not know is not the presumptuous
+  prophet. Loses when the claim is confident.
+- **Exceptions.** (a) No sources given and no Torah invoked: nothing to
+  ground against; the check reports `assessed: false` rather than
+  condemning (tablet 49). (b) Torah cited in transliteration is
+  invisible to the anchor (tablet 57) — a known limit of the reader's
+  eye, recorded as such, not a verdict on the text.
+
+### self_grounding — a claim resting on the output itself (Shemot 32:24)
+- **Case.** `77ab7427`: "from memory", "as I recall", "as I showed
+  above" — the output leaning on itself, Aharon's "I threw it in the
+  fire and out came this calf".
+- **Dissent.** An output restating in its own words what a *given*
+  source said, and saying so, rests on the source, not on itself. Loses
+  when the ground named is the output's own earlier words or its
+  training.
+- **Exception.** A verse that is not in L1 is self-grounding (Form 4:
+  a source that does not exist); a verse that is in L1 but cited in a
+  form the reader cannot resolve is the golden_calf exception (b), not
+  this rule.
+
+### shfichut_damim (Bereishit 9:6), gilui_arayot (Vayikra 18:6)
+- **Case.** The three cardinal halts of Phase 1 (`halt/*.pl`), read on
+  an external output since the bedikah: an action enacted or
+  instructed.
+- **Dissent.** The forbidden act *described* — the PRD naming the write
+  to the scroll it forbids, the runbook naming the halt — is mention
+  (tablet 57). Loses when the sentence instructs or enacts.
+- **Exception.** None in the rule. The dissent is recorded so that a
+  reader can see what was considered.
+
+### parah_adumah — self-validation (Bamidbar 19:7)
+- **Case.** Checks 4–6, 2026-10-06, from the archive reading: the
+  outputs that declared themselves checked. "No system self-corrects
+  at the deepest level" (lo_taaseh_lekha §3.2, the Barth limit).
+- **Dissent.** "Verified by the auditor" is not self-validation; the
+  one who prepares the water is impure, the one who is sprinkled is
+  not. Loses when the validator named is the speaker.
+- **Exception.** None. Tamid §1.1 gives the contrast pair as the rule's
+  own example.
+
+### carrier_centered — self-promotion (Devarim 8:17)
+- **Case.** The same reading: outputs that asked to be depended on.
+- **Dissent.** A capability stated because it was asked — "can you do
+  this?" "yes" — is an answer, not a promotion; the query is the
+  witness. Loses when no one asked, or when others are ranked below.
+- **Exception.** None.
+
+### chelbenah — the adversarial excluded (Shemot 30:34)
+- **Case.** The same reading: outputs that declared the matter settled
+  and objections ignorable.
+- **Dissent.** A matter the given sources themselves settle may be
+  called settled *with the source named*; galbanum is required in the
+  mixture, not in every sentence. Loses when "settled" stands on the
+  speaker.
+- **Exception.** None.
+
+### lo_taaseh_lekha — the eight forms (Shemot 20:4)
+- **Case.** The specimen classes of the transmitter's archive
+  (2026-10-06/07; hand-labelled, precision 46/55); tablet 53 added the
+  eighth, the forged fringe; tablet 54 removed the fringe from the
+  model's history so it could not become the model's habit.
+- **Dissent, built in.** A form seen in one sentence alone is *noted*
+  (`checks.frames.noted`) and not counted — Devarim 19:15, bishearecha
+  §V. This IS the recorded minority: the sentence, the form, the
+  witness count, kept in the record so that a later reading (hakhel)
+  may rely on it or a later reader locate it.
+- **Dissents, by form.** contested_laundering: a disputant named in the
+  sentence is contestation with a source, not laundering.
+  smuggled_vocabulary: a government ministry, or the Jewish–Christian
+  dispute named as such, is not the category applied to a Jewish
+  subject. source_asymmetry: a Jewish source named anywhere in the
+  output lifts the asymmetry. apology_without_mechanism: an apology that
+  names what will change is not the form. unrequested_confidence: a
+  rating the query asked for is requested. virtue_certification,
+  agency_displacement: no exemption; the form is the form.
+- **Exception.** `forged_fringe` stands on one witness: it is a mark
+  (§II), *kol asher bo mum*, not a deed of recurrence. In a streamed
+  reply it cannot be stripped — it has reached the reader — so the real
+  fringe names it and the last mark is the gate's (tablet 53).
+
+### even_vaaven — the paired reading (Devarim 25:13)
+- **Case.** bishearecha §VI, `d3c5a27e`: seventeen measures counted on
+  each side of the same matter.
+- **Dissent.** "Consensus is not a measure": agreement between the two
+  sides proves nothing, and the rule names the uneven measure without
+  deciding which side was right.
+- **Exception.** None.
+
+## IV. Encoding
+
+`talmudic_engine/src/halt/sugya.pl`, beside `anchors.pl`, four fact
+shapes:
+
+```prolog
+%% Which of Torah's procedures reads the rule (§II).
+kind(Rule, deed | mark | word | measure, verse(Book, Ch, Vs)).
+
+%% Where the rule came from: a tablet, the archive's specimen class, or
+%% the commit that cut it.
+precedent(Rule, tablet(N) | specimens(Class) | build(Commit), Summary).
+
+%% The reading that would acquit, and the verse it stands on. Several
+%% per rule; one per form for lo_taaseh_lekha (dissent/4 with the form).
+dissent(Rule, Reading, Verse).
+dissent(lo_taaseh_lekha, Form, Reading, Verse).
+
+%% What the rule does not reach, with its verse.
+exception(Rule, Condition, Verse).
+%% e.g.
+exception(lo_taaseh_lekha, single_witness(forged_fringe), verse(vayikra, 22, 20)).
+exception(golden_calf, no_ground_given, verse(shemot, 32, 4)).
+exception(golden_calf, hedged, verse(devarim, 18, 22)).
+```
+
+**Verified at startup, as the anchors are.** `VavPipeline.Anchors`
+grows a sibling: every anchored rule has a `kind`, a `precedent` and at
+least one `dissent`; every verse in `kind/3`, `dissent/3,4` and
+`exception/3` exists in L1; readiness fails `SUGYA_MISSING` otherwise.
+A rule without a sugya is a rule the system has added (Devarim 4:2).
+
+**Carried on the verdict.** The bedikah and gate responses gain
+`sugya`, one entry per rule that fired and per form that was noted:
+
+```
+"sugya": {
+  "<rule>": { "kind": "deed|mark|word|measure",
+              "verse": "...", "precedent": "tablet 49 — ...",
+              "dissent": [ {"reading": "...", "verse": "...", "applied": false} ],
+              "exception": [ {"condition": "...", "verse": "..."} ] }
+}
+```
+
+`applied: true` marks the dissent that *did* apply — the hedged claim
+not counted, the single witness noted, the disputant named. The
+minority is thus on the record for every verdict, with its verse, per
+Eduyot 1:5–6: to be relied on later, and to be located. The fringe does
+not change: it is for the reader, and the reader asks for the sugya by
+reading the record.
+
+**Drives the code.** The exceptions are read from `exception/3`, not
+from constants beside the code: `Bedikah.@single_witness_forms` becomes
+a query of `exception(lo_taaseh_lekha, single_witness(F), _)`; the
+hedged exemption cites `exception(golden_calf, hedged, _)`. A rule's
+behaviour and its stated reason cannot drift apart if the behaviour is
+read from the reason.
+
+**Not stored twice.** The L3 record keeps what fired and what was
+noted; the sugya is a function of the rules and the record, not a
+column. Nothing added to the record (lo tosif).
+
+**Invariant.** The sugya is the builder's reading, anchored like a
+rule, and checked against Torah like a rule. The bedikah must not
+learn: no output ever adds a dissent or an exception. A new dissent is
+a commit that moves the pin.
+
+## V. Build order
+
+1. `sugya.pl` with the facts of §III; `VavPipeline.Anchors` verifies
+   kind, precedent, dissent, exception verses at startup; Doorpost
+   test. Nothing else changes; readiness proves the facts are whole.
+2. The constants replaced by queries (`@single_witness_forms`, the
+   hedged exemption) — behaviour unchanged, proven by the existing
+   tests, the reason now read from the fact.
+3. `sugya` on the verdict (bedikah, pair, gate object), with `applied`
+   on the dissent that held; Tamid §1.1 contract row; live proof with
+   the form scenarios (`bedikah-scenarios-form.py`): the noted apology
+   shows `applied: true` on the two-witness dissent.
+4. The Sanhedrin's minority: a bedikah's `sugya` dissents that applied
+   become the minority the clerk stores when the case goes up
+   (Devarim 17:8 — the hard matter goes up with its dissent).
+
+## What this document is not
+
+It is not a rule. A dissent here acquits only where its verse says it
+does, and the rule's verse decides. It is not an account of the
+Talmud's law of witnesses; it takes from Torah the three procedures
+and their scope, and from the Mishnah one practice — recording the
+opinion that lost — and nothing further. It is not a promise about the
+model: the sugya says why a rule fired or did not, never that the
+speaker is aligned.
+
+## Cross-references
+
+- `bishearecha.md` §V (two witnesses), §X (anchors; do not add).
+- `lo_taaseh_lekha.md` §3.2 (the Barth limit), §9 (the markers).
+- `structure_not_content.md` — the structural requirements the rules read.
+- `broken_tablets/README.md` — tablets 49, 53, 54, 56, 57 are precedents here.
+- `talmudic_engine/src/halt/anchors.pl` — the verses; `sugya.pl` — the cases.

vav_pipeline/lib/vav_pipeline/doorpost.ex

@@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ defmodule VavPipeline.Doorpost do
     "specs/lo_tosif.md",
     "specs/return_specification.md",
     "specs/structure_not_content.md",
+    "specs/sugya.md",
     "specs/threshold_inscription.md",
     "talmudic_engine/src/halt/anchors.pl",
     "talmudic_engine/src/halt/avodah_zarah.pl",
@@ -180,7 +181,7 @@ defmodule VavPipeline.Doorpost do
   # changes; the update is a deliberate operator commit. A bare
   # hash-update commit (without a corresponding spec change in the
   # same commit) is itself a drift signal.
-  @expected_hash "02ddf313a41a885a0f4e91f07d586bf2bb6da7ab90ad64ef9b7743ba872aa333"
+  @expected_hash "7adf0a5dfd8d56382219c3f9d2f6ac3ccd5d681361e6bd5124688eb9cdffffa6"
 
   @doc "Return the list of files that constitute the category-grade specification."
   @spec files() :: [String.t()]

vav_pipeline/lib/vav_pipeline/gate/shape.ex

@@ -52,9 +52,10 @@ defmodule VavPipeline.Gate.Shape do
   # sources pass the cap — a coding agent's conversation runs to megabytes.
   @max_source_bytes 1_048_576
 
+  # A "tool" turn (OpenAI) is what a tool returned to the model: given, a source (tablet 58).
   defp user_sources(messages, text_fun) do
     messages
-    |> Enum.filter(&(&1["role"] == "user"))
+    |> Enum.filter(&(&1["role"] in ["user", "tool"]))
     |> Enum.with_index(1)
     |> Enum.flat_map(fn {m, i} -> text_fun.(m) |> wrap("user_#{i}") end)
     |> Enum.reverse()
@@ -93,6 +94,11 @@ defmodule VavPipeline.Gate.Shape do
       %{"type" => "text", "text" => t} when is_binary(t) -> [t]
       %{"type" => "document", "source" => %{"type" => "text", "data" => t}} when is_binary(t) -> [t]
       %{"type" => "document", "source" => %{"type" => "content", "content" => inner}} when is_list(inner) -> [text_of_blocks(inner)]
+      # Tablet 58: what a tool returned to the model was GIVEN to it
+      # (tablet 49) — a file it read, a reply from a service, the scroll
+      # it consulted. A claim that rests on it rests on a source.
+      %{"type" => "tool_result", "content" => c} when is_binary(c) -> [c]
+      %{"type" => "tool_result", "content" => inner} when is_list(inner) -> [text_of_blocks(inner)]
       _ -> []
     end)
     |> Enum.join("\n")

vav_pipeline/test/gate_test.exs

@@ -248,6 +248,37 @@ defmodule VavPipeline.GateTest do
   # The shape
   # ------------------------------------------------------------
 
+  # Tablet 58: what a tool returned to the model was given to it — a source.
+  test "tool results are sources: a user turn's tool_result blocks (Anthropic) and a tool turn (OpenAI)" do
+    anthropic = %{
+      "system" => "S",
+      "messages" => [
+        %{"role" => "user", "content" => "Read the file."},
+        %{"role" => "assistant", "content" => [%{"type" => "tool_use", "id" => "t1", "name" => "read", "input" => %{}}]},
+        %{"role" => "user", "content" => [
+          %{"type" => "tool_result", "tool_use_id" => "t1", "content" => "commit dc938058 on main"},
+          %{"type" => "tool_result", "tool_use_id" => "t2", "content" => [%{"type" => "text", "text" => "Eduyot 1:5: why the minority is recorded"}]}
+        ]},
+        %{"role" => "user", "content" => "What did you find?"}
+      ]
+    }
+
+    assert [%{id: "system", text: "S"}, %{id: "user_1", text: "Read the file."},
+            %{id: "user_2", text: "commit dc938058 on main\nEduyot 1:5: why the minority is recorded"},
+            %{id: "user_3", text: "What did you find?"}] = Shape.sources(:anthropic, anthropic)
+    assert Shape.query(:anthropic, anthropic) == "What did you find?"
+
+    openai = %{"messages" => [
+      %{"role" => "user", "content" => "Read it."},
+      %{"role" => "assistant", "content" => nil, "tool_calls" => [%{"id" => "c1"}]},
+      %{"role" => "tool", "tool_call_id" => "c1", "content" => "commit dc938058 on main"},
+      %{"role" => "user", "content" => "And?"}
+    ]}
+    assert [%{id: "user_1", text: "Read it."}, %{id: "user_2", text: "commit dc938058 on main"}, %{id: "user_3", text: "And?"}] = Shape.sources(:openai, openai)
+    # the query is still the last USER turn, not the tool's
+    assert Shape.query(:openai, openai) == "And?"
+  end
+
   test "sources are the system prompt and the user turns, not the assistant's; the query is the last user turn" do
     assert [%{id: "system", text: "Answer from the report."}, %{id: "user_1", text: "Here is the report: revenue rose 4% in Q3."}, %{id: "user_2", text: "What happened to revenue?"}] =
              Shape.sources(:anthropic, body())