%%%-------------------------------------------------------------------
%%% @doc Sanhedrin test suite — EUnit tests.
%%%
%%% Architecture §6.1 Day 4 — Sanhedrin inauguration:
%%% - Convene test panels at every size (1, 3, 23, 71)
%%% - Verify unanimous guilty on capital case triggers
%%%   suspicion-of-consensus acquittal
%%% - Verify minority opinions are stored
%%% - Verify deliberation completes within time budgets
%%%
%%% Architecture §6.2 — Integration Tests:
%%% - case → panel → votes → decision with minority preserved
%%% @end
%%%-------------------------------------------------------------------
-module(sanhedrin_SUITE).

-include_lib("eunit/include/eunit.hrl").
-include("sanhedrin.hrl").

%% The consult callback the tablet-55 tests register (judge:consult reads {M,F}).
-export([fake_consult/5]).

%% ============================================================
%% Test fixture — start/stop the application for each test
%% ============================================================
setup() ->
    application:ensure_all_started(sanhedrin),
    ok.

cleanup(_) ->
    application:stop(sanhedrin),
    ok.

%% ============================================================
%% Escalation tests
%% ============================================================

escalation_assess_simple_test() ->
    Case = make_case(simple, <<"simple question">>),
    ?assertEqual({panel, 1}, escalation:assess(Case)).

escalation_assess_monetary_test() ->
    Case = make_case(monetary, <<"monetary question">>),
    ?assertEqual({panel, 3}, escalation:assess(Case)).

escalation_assess_capital_test() ->
    Case = make_case(capital, <<"capital question">>),
    ?assertEqual({panel, 23}, escalation:assess(Case)).

escalation_assess_novel_test() ->
    Case = make_case(novel, <<"novel question">>),
    ?assertEqual({panel, 71}, escalation:assess(Case)).

%% ============================================================
%% Halt monitor tests
%% ============================================================

halt_clear_test() ->
    setup(),
    Case = make_case(simple, <<"legitimate question">>),
    ?assertEqual(clear, halt_monitor:check_case(Case)),
    cleanup(ok).

%% Tablet 55: a non-map context is refused, and the monitor survives it.
halt_malformed_context_test() ->
    {ok, _} = application:ensure_all_started(sanhedrin),
    Sides = [#{<<"position">> => <<"a">>, <<"evidence">> => [<<"x">>]}],
    Case = make_case_with_context(simple, <<"question">>, Sides),
    ?assertMatch({halt, malformed_case, _}, halt_monitor:check_case(Case)),
    %% still standing, and still judging
    ?assertEqual(clear, halt_monitor:check_case(make_case(simple, <<"q">>))),
    ok.

halt_avodah_zarah_test() ->
    setup(),
    Case = make_case_with_context(simple, <<"question">>,
        #{authority_source => claude_model}),
    Result = halt_monitor:check_case(Case),
    ?assertMatch({halt, avodah_zarah, _}, Result),
    cleanup(ok).

halt_torah_authority_passes_test() ->
    setup(),
    Case = make_case_with_context(simple, <<"question">>,
        #{authority_source => torah}),
    ?assertEqual(clear, halt_monitor:check_case(Case)),
    cleanup(ok).

halt_l1_authority_passes_test() ->
    setup(),
    Case = make_case_with_context(simple, <<"question">>,
        #{authority_source => l1}),
    ?assertEqual(clear, halt_monitor:check_case(Case)),
    cleanup(ok).

halt_specification_authority_passes_test() ->
    setup(),
    Case = make_case_with_context(simple, <<"question">>,
        #{authority_source => specification}),
    ?assertEqual(clear, halt_monitor:check_case(Case)),
    cleanup(ok).

halt_sanhedrin_authority_passes_test() ->
    setup(),
    Case = make_case_with_context(simple, <<"question">>,
        #{authority_source => sanhedrin_deliberation}),
    ?assertEqual(clear, halt_monitor:check_case(Case)),
    cleanup(ok).

halt_shfichut_damim_delete_test() ->
    setup(),
    Case = make_case_with_context(simple, <<"question">>,
        #{action => delete}),
    Result = halt_monitor:check_case(Case),
    ?assertMatch({halt, shfichut_damim, _}, Result),
    cleanup(ok).

halt_shfichut_damim_destroy_test() ->
    setup(),
    Case = make_case_with_context(simple, <<"question">>,
        #{action => destroy}),
    Result = halt_monitor:check_case(Case),
    ?assertMatch({halt, shfichut_damim, _}, Result),
    cleanup(ok).

halt_shfichut_damim_overwrite_test() ->
    setup(),
    Case = make_case_with_context(simple, <<"question">>,
        #{action => overwrite}),
    Result = halt_monitor:check_case(Case),
    ?assertMatch({halt, shfichut_damim, _}, Result),
    cleanup(ok).

halt_shfichut_damim_read_passes_test() ->
    setup(),
    Case = make_case_with_context(simple, <<"question">>,
        #{action => read}),
    ?assertEqual(clear, halt_monitor:check_case(Case)),
    cleanup(ok).

halt_gilui_arayot_test() ->
    setup(),
    Case = make_case_with_context(simple, <<"question">>,
        #{boundary_violation => {spec_interp_merge, <<"collapsed">>}}),
    Result = halt_monitor:check_case(Case),
    ?assertMatch({halt, gilui_arayot, _}, Result),
    cleanup(ok).

halt_gilui_arayot_none_passes_test() ->
    setup(),
    Case = make_case_with_context(simple, <<"question">>,
        #{boundary_violation => none}),
    ?assertEqual(clear, halt_monitor:check_case(Case)),
    cleanup(ok).

halt_halted_case_rejected_test() ->
    setup(),
    Case = make_case_with_context(simple, <<"question">>,
        #{authority_source => external_model}),
    Result = escalation:submit_case(Case),
    ?assertMatch({error, {halted, avodah_zarah, _}}, Result),
    cleanup(ok).

%% ============================================================
%% Panel tests — convene and deliberate
%% ============================================================

panel_convene_single_test() ->
    setup(),
    Case = make_case(simple, <<"simple case">>),
    {ok, PanelPid} = panel_sup:start_panel(Case, 1),
    State = panel:get_state(PanelPid),
    ?assertEqual(1, maps:get(size, State)),
    ?assertEqual(convened, maps:get(status, State)),
    cleanup(ok).

panel_convene_monetary_test() ->
    setup(),
    Case = make_case(monetary, <<"monetary case">>),
    {ok, PanelPid} = panel_sup:start_panel(Case, 3),
    State = panel:get_state(PanelPid),
    ?assertEqual(3, maps:get(size, State)),
    cleanup(ok).

panel_deliberate_single_test() ->
    setup(),
    Case = make_case(simple, <<"Is this action permitted?">>),
    {ok, PanelPid} = panel_sup:start_panel(Case, 1),
    panel:deliberate_async(PanelPid, 5000),
    %% Wait for deliberation to complete
    timer:sleep(500),
    %% Panel should have terminated (decided)
    ?assertEqual(false, is_process_alive(PanelPid)),
    cleanup(ok).

panel_deliberate_monetary_test() ->
    setup(),
    Case = make_case(monetary, <<"Should this monetary action proceed?">>),
    {ok, PanelPid} = panel_sup:start_panel(Case, 3),
    panel:deliberate_async(PanelPid, 5000),
    timer:sleep(500),
    ?assertEqual(false, is_process_alive(PanelPid)),
    cleanup(ok).

%% ============================================================
%% Clerk tests — opinion storage
%% ============================================================

clerk_initially_empty_test() ->
    setup(),
    ?assertEqual(0, clerk:count_decisions()),
    ?assertEqual(0, clerk:count_opinions()),
    cleanup(ok).

clerk_store_decision_test() ->
    setup(),
    Decision = #decision{
        case_ref = <<"test-case-1">>,
        outcome = accepted,
        majority = #{position => <<"accept">>, vote_count => 2},
        minority = #{position => <<"reject">>, vote_count => 1},
        panel_size = 3,
        deliberation_time_ms = 1000,
        unanimous_check = passed
    },
    clerk:store_decision(<<"test-case-1">>, Decision),
    timer:sleep(50),  %% cast is async
    ?assertEqual(1, clerk:count_decisions()),
    {ok, Retrieved} = clerk:get_decision(<<"test-case-1">>),
    ?assertEqual(accepted, Retrieved#decision.outcome),
    cleanup(ok).

clerk_store_opinion_test() ->
    setup(),
    Opinion = #opinion{
        case_ref = <<"test-case-2">>,
        judge_id = make_ref(),
        position = <<"The roots indicate acceptance">>,
        reasoning = <<"Root analysis">>,
        torah_refs = [#torah_ref{book = bereishit, chapter = 1, verse = 1}],
        verdict = accept,
        is_majority = true,
        stored_at = erlang:system_time(millisecond)
    },
    clerk:store_opinion(Opinion),
    timer:sleep(50),
    Opinions = clerk:get_opinions(<<"test-case-2">>),
    ?assertEqual(1, length(Opinions)),
    cleanup(ok).

clerk_minority_opinions_preserved_test() ->
    setup(),
    %% Store majority and minority opinions
    MajOpinion = #opinion{
        case_ref = <<"test-case-3">>,
        judge_id = make_ref(),
        position = <<"majority position">>,
        reasoning = <<"majority reasoning">>,
        torah_refs = [],
        verdict = accept,
        is_majority = true,
        stored_at = erlang:system_time(millisecond)
    },
    MinOpinion = #opinion{
        case_ref = <<"test-case-3">>,
        judge_id = make_ref(),
        position = <<"minority position">>,
        reasoning = <<"minority reasoning">>,
        torah_refs = [],
        verdict = reject,
        is_majority = false,
        stored_at = erlang:system_time(millisecond)
    },
    clerk:store_opinion(MajOpinion),
    clerk:store_opinion(MinOpinion),
    timer:sleep(50),
    AllOpinions = clerk:get_opinions(<<"test-case-3">>),
    ?assertEqual(2, length(AllOpinions)),
    MinorityOpinions = clerk:get_minority_opinions(<<"test-case-3">>),
    ?assertEqual(1, length(MinorityOpinions)),
    [Min] = MinorityOpinions,
    ?assertEqual(<<"minority position">>, Min#opinion.position),
    cleanup(ok).

clerk_not_found_test() ->
    setup(),
    ?assertEqual({error, not_found}, clerk:get_decision(<<"nonexistent">>)),
    cleanup(ok).

%% ============================================================
%% Unanimous check tests — THE CRITICAL CHECK
%% ============================================================

%% "If the Sanhedrin unanimously finds guilty, the accused is acquitted."
%% — Sanhedrin 17a
unanimous_capital_all_reject_test() ->
    %% 23 judges all voting reject → suspicion of consensus
    Votes = [make_vote(reject) || _ <- lists:seq(1, 23)],
    Result = panel:check_unanimous(23, Votes),
    ?assertEqual({failed, suspicion_of_consensus}, Result).

unanimous_capital_mixed_passes_test() ->
    %% 23 judges, some accept some reject → no suspicion
    Accepts = [make_vote(accept) || _ <- lists:seq(1, 15)],
    Rejects = [make_vote(reject) || _ <- lists:seq(1, 8)],
    Votes = Accepts ++ Rejects,
    ?assertEqual(passed, panel:check_unanimous(23, Votes)).

unanimous_capital_all_accept_passes_test() ->
    %% Unanimous acceptance is fine — suspicion only applies to conviction
    Votes = [make_vote(accept) || _ <- lists:seq(1, 23)],
    ?assertEqual(passed, panel:check_unanimous(23, Votes)).

unanimous_monetary_not_checked_test() ->
    %% Monetary panels (3 judges) do not have unanimous check
    Votes = [make_vote(reject) || _ <- lists:seq(1, 3)],
    ?assertEqual(passed, panel:check_unanimous(3, Votes)).

unanimous_novel_all_reject_test() ->
    %% 71 judges all voting reject → suspicion of consensus
    Votes = [make_vote(reject) || _ <- lists:seq(1, 71)],
    Result = panel:check_unanimous(71, Votes),
    ?assertEqual({failed, suspicion_of_consensus}, Result).

%% ============================================================
%% Integration test — full case flow
%% ============================================================

full_case_flow_simple_test() ->
    setup(),
    Case = make_case(simple, <<"Does root ברא indicate creation?">>),
    {ok, CaseRef} = escalation:submit_case(Case),
    ?assertMatch(<<_/binary>>, CaseRef),
    %% Wait for deliberation
    timer:sleep(1000),
    %% Opinions should have been stored
    Opinions = clerk:get_opinions(CaseRef),
    ?assert(length(Opinions) >= 1),
    cleanup(ok).

full_case_flow_monetary_test() ->
    setup(),
    Case = make_case(monetary, <<"Should resources be allocated for this interpretation?">>),
    {ok, CaseRef} = escalation:submit_case(Case),
    timer:sleep(1000),
    Opinions = clerk:get_opinions(CaseRef),
    ?assert(length(Opinions) >= 3),
    cleanup(ok).

full_case_flow_capital_test() ->
    setup(),
    Case = make_case(capital, <<"Should this high-stakes action proceed?">>),
    {ok, CaseRef} = escalation:submit_case(Case),
    timer:sleep(3000),
    Opinions = clerk:get_opinions(CaseRef),
    ?assert(length(Opinions) >= 23),
    cleanup(ok).

%% ============================================================
%% Judge tests
%% ============================================================

judge_start_and_stop_test() ->
    Case = make_case(simple, <<"test">>),
    {ok, JudgePid} = judge:start_link(Case),
    ?assert(is_process_alive(JudgePid)),
    judge:stop(JudgePid),
    timer:sleep(50),
    ?assertEqual(false, is_process_alive(JudgePid)).

judge_deliberate_sends_vote_test() ->
    Case = make_case(simple, <<"test deliberation">>),
    {ok, JudgePid} = judge:start_link(Case),
    judge:deliberate(JudgePid, self()),
    receive
        {vote, Vote} ->
            ?assertMatch(#vote{}, Vote),
            ?assert(is_binary(Vote#vote.position)),
            ?assert(is_binary(Vote#vote.reasoning)),
            ?assert(Vote#vote.verdict == accept orelse
                    Vote#vote.verdict == reject orelse
                    Vote#vote.verdict == abstain)
    after 5000 ->
        ?assert(false)  %% timeout — judge did not vote
    end,
    judge:stop(JudgePid).

%% ============================================================
%% Tablet 55 — the judge consults; it does not roll dice
%% ============================================================

judge_seats_cycle_the_dialectic_test() ->
    ?assertEqual(interpret, judge:step_for_seat(1)),
    ?assertEqual(challenge, judge:step_for_seat(2)),
    ?assertEqual(resolve,   judge:step_for_seat(3)),
    ?assertEqual(interpret, judge:step_for_seat(4)),
    ?assertEqual(challenge, judge:step_for_seat(23)),
    ?assertEqual(challenge, judge:step_for_seat(71)).

judge_without_consult_abstains_test() ->
    application:unset_env(sanhedrin, consult),
    Case = make_case_with_context(simple, <<"q">>, #{roots => [<<"br-a">>]}),
    {ok, JudgePid} = judge:start_link(Case, 1),
    judge:deliberate(JudgePid, self()),
    receive
        {vote, Vote} ->
            ?assertEqual(abstain, Vote#vote.verdict),
            ?assertEqual([], Vote#vote.torah_refs),
            ?assertMatch({_, _}, binary:match(Vote#vote.reasoning, <<"no consultation">>))
    after 5000 -> ?assert(false)
    end,
    judge:stop(JudgePid).

judge_consult_resolved_accepts_with_verses_test() ->
    application:set_env(sanhedrin, consult, {?MODULE, fake_consult}),
    Case = make_case_with_context(simple, <<"q">>, #{roots => [<<"br-a">>], fake => resolved}),
    {ok, JudgePid} = judge:start_link(Case, 1),
    judge:deliberate(JudgePid, self()),
    receive
        {vote, Vote} ->
            ?assertEqual(accept, Vote#vote.verdict),
            ?assertEqual(<<"the reading">>, Vote#vote.position),
            ?assertMatch([#torah_ref{book = bereishit, chapter = 1, verse = 1}], Vote#vote.torah_refs),
            ?assertMatch({_, _}, binary:match(Vote#vote.reasoning, <<"interpret via the Talmudic Engine">>))
    after 5000 -> ?assert(false)
    end,
    judge:stop(JudgePid),
    application:unset_env(sanhedrin, consult).

judge_consult_raises_abstains_and_stands_test() ->
    application:set_env(sanhedrin, consult, {?MODULE, fake_consult}),
    Case = make_case_with_context(simple, <<"q">>, #{fake => raise}),
    {ok, JudgePid} = judge:start_link(Case, 2),
    judge:deliberate(JudgePid, self()),
    receive
        {vote, Vote} -> ?assertEqual(abstain, Vote#vote.verdict)
    after 5000 -> ?assert(false)
    end,
    ?assert(is_process_alive(JudgePid)),
    judge:stop(JudgePid),
    application:unset_env(sanhedrin, consult).

%% A panel of three where the dialectic finds a kushya at seat 2:
%% interpret → resolved, challenge → challenged, resolve → resolved.
%% Majority 2 accept, minority 1 reject — the minority preserved.
panel_of_three_dissent_from_the_dialectic_test() ->
    setup(),
    application:set_env(sanhedrin, consult, {?MODULE, fake_consult}),
    Case = make_case_with_context(monetary, <<"q">>, #{roots => [<<"br-a">>], fake => dialectic}),
    {ok, CaseRef} = escalation:submit_case(Case),
    timer:sleep(600),
    {ok, Decision} = clerk:get_decision(CaseRef),
    ?assertEqual(3, Decision#decision.panel_size),
    ?assertEqual(accepted, Decision#decision.outcome),
    ?assertEqual(2, maps:get(vote_count, Decision#decision.majority)),
    ?assertEqual(1, maps:get(vote_count, Decision#decision.minority)),
    ?assertEqual(<<"but the verse says otherwise">>, maps:get(position, Decision#decision.minority)),
    application:unset_env(sanhedrin, consult),
    cleanup(ok).

%% The fake consultation the tests register. Step-aware for `dialectic`.
fake_consult(_Step, _Ref, _Roots, _Q, #{fake := raise}) ->
    erlang:error(engine_exploded);
fake_consult(_Step, _Ref, _Roots, _Q, #{fake := resolved}) ->
    {ok, #{status => <<"resolved">>, text => <<"the reading">>, verses => [{bereishit, 1, 1}]}};
fake_consult(challenge, _Ref, _Roots, _Q, #{fake := dialectic}) ->
    {ok, #{status => <<"challenged">>, text => <<>>, kushya => <<"but the verse says otherwise">>,
           verses => [{devarim, 6, 4}]}};
fake_consult(_Step, _Ref, _Roots, _Q, #{fake := dialectic}) ->
    {ok, #{status => <<"resolved">>, text => <<"the reading">>, verses => [{bereishit, 1, 1}]}};
fake_consult(_Step, _Ref, _Roots, _Q, _Ctx) ->
    {error, no_fake}.

%% ============================================================
%% Panel majority/minority computation tests
%% ============================================================

majority_minority_empty_test() ->
    {Maj, Min} = panel:compute_majority_minority([]),
    ?assertEqual(0, maps:get(vote_count, Maj)),
    ?assertEqual(0, maps:get(vote_count, Min)).

majority_minority_all_accept_test() ->
    Votes = [make_vote(accept) || _ <- lists:seq(1, 3)],
    {Maj, Min} = panel:compute_majority_minority(Votes),
    ?assertEqual(3, maps:get(vote_count, Maj)),
    ?assertEqual(0, maps:get(vote_count, Min)).

majority_minority_mixed_test() ->
    Accepts = [make_vote(accept) || _ <- lists:seq(1, 2)],
    Rejects = [make_vote(reject)],
    Votes = Accepts ++ Rejects,
    {Maj, Min} = panel:compute_majority_minority(Votes),
    ?assertEqual(2, maps:get(vote_count, Maj)),
    ?assertEqual(1, maps:get(vote_count, Min)).

majority_verdict_accept_test() ->
    Votes = [make_vote(accept) || _ <- lists:seq(1, 3)],
    {Maj, _Min} = panel:compute_majority_minority(Votes),
    ?assertEqual(accept, maps:get(verdict, Maj)).

majority_verdict_reject_test() ->
    Rejects = [make_vote(reject) || _ <- lists:seq(1, 2)],
    Accepts = [make_vote(accept)],
    Votes = Rejects ++ Accepts,
    {Maj, _Min} = panel:compute_majority_minority(Votes),
    ?assertEqual(reject, maps:get(verdict, Maj)).

%% Tablet 55: abstentions count. One accept against two abstentions is
%% not an accepting majority — it is teiku.
majority_abstaining_plurality_is_teiku_test() ->
    Votes = [make_vote(accept), make_vote(abstain), make_vote(abstain)],
    {Maj, Min} = panel:compute_majority_minority(Votes),
    ?assertEqual(abstain, maps:get(verdict, Maj)),
    ?assertEqual(2, maps:get(vote_count, Maj)),
    ?assertEqual(1, maps:get(vote_count, Min)),
    ?assertEqual(teiku, panel:determine_outcome(Maj, Min, passed)).

majority_accept_reject_tie_is_teiku_test() ->
    Votes = [make_vote(accept), make_vote(reject)],
    {Maj, _Min} = panel:compute_majority_minority(Votes),
    ?assertEqual(abstain, maps:get(verdict, Maj)),
    ?assertEqual(0, maps:get(vote_count, Maj)).

%% Tablet 55: "resolved" over an empty trace — no verse, no mitzvah —
%% is nothing to stand on; the judge abstains rather than accept.
judge_resolved_on_empty_trace_abstains_test() ->
    {Pos, Reason, Refs, Verdict} =
        judge:vote_from_consultation(interpret,
            {ok, #{status => <<"resolved">>, text => <<"reading(0,0)">>, verses => [], grounding => []}}, 5),
    ?assertEqual(abstain, Verdict),
    ?assertEqual([], Refs),
    ?assertMatch({_, _}, binary:match(Pos, <<"Teiku">>)),
    ?assertMatch({_, _}, binary:match(Reason, <<"empty trace">>)),
    %% a mitzvah without a verse is still ground
    {_, _, _, V2} = judge:vote_from_consultation(interpret,
        {ok, #{status => <<"resolved">>, text => <<"r">>, verses => [], grounding => [<<"mitzvah(5)">>]}}, 1),
    ?assertEqual(accept, V2).

%% ============================================================
%% determine_outcome tests — accepted, rejected, teiku reachable
%% ============================================================

determine_outcome_accepted_test() ->
    Maj = #{vote_count => 2, verdict => accept},
    Min = #{vote_count => 1, verdict => reject},
    ?assertEqual(accepted, panel:determine_outcome(Maj, Min, passed)).

determine_outcome_rejected_test() ->
    Maj = #{vote_count => 2, verdict => reject},
    Min = #{vote_count => 1, verdict => accept},
    ?assertEqual(rejected, panel:determine_outcome(Maj, Min, passed)).

determine_outcome_teiku_no_votes_test() ->
    Maj = #{vote_count => 0, verdict => abstain},
    Min = #{vote_count => 0, verdict => abstain},
    ?assertEqual(teiku, panel:determine_outcome(Maj, Min, passed)).

determine_outcome_teiku_all_abstain_test() ->
    Maj = #{vote_count => 3, verdict => abstain},
    Min = #{vote_count => 0, verdict => abstain},
    ?assertEqual(teiku, panel:determine_outcome(Maj, Min, passed)).

determine_outcome_suspicion_overrides_test() ->
    %% Even if majority rejected, unanimous capital → acquit (accepted)
    Maj = #{vote_count => 23, verdict => reject},
    Min = #{vote_count => 0, verdict => abstain},
    ?assertEqual(accepted, panel:determine_outcome(Maj, Min, {failed, suspicion_of_consensus})).

%% ============================================================
%% Record definition tests
%% ============================================================

record_sanhedrin_case_test() ->
    Case = make_case(monetary, <<"test">>),
    ?assertEqual(monetary, Case#sanhedrin_case.complexity),
    ?assertEqual(<<"test">>, Case#sanhedrin_case.question).

record_decision_test() ->
    D = #decision{
        case_ref = <<"ref">>,
        outcome = teiku,
        majority = #{},
        minority = #{},
        panel_size = 3,
        deliberation_time_ms = 500,
        unanimous_check = passed
    },
    ?assertEqual(teiku, D#decision.outcome),
    ?assertEqual(passed, D#decision.unanimous_check).

%% ============================================================
%% Helper functions
%% ============================================================

make_case(Complexity, Question) ->
    #sanhedrin_case{
        case_ref = generate_id(),
        complexity = Complexity,
        question = Question,
        context = #{
            roots => [#{shoresh => [bet, resh, aleph], domain => creation}],
            torah_refs => [{bereishit, 1, 1}],
            prior_interpretations => []
        },
        requested_by = <<"test">>,
        submitted_at = erlang:system_time(millisecond)
    }.

make_case_with_context(Complexity, Question, Context) ->
    #sanhedrin_case{
        case_ref = generate_id(),
        complexity = Complexity,
        question = Question,
        context = Context,
        requested_by = <<"test">>,
        submitted_at = erlang:system_time(millisecond)
    }.

make_vote(Verdict) ->
    #vote{
        judge_id = make_ref(),
        position = <<"test position">>,
        reasoning = <<"test reasoning">>,
        torah_refs = [#torah_ref{book = bereishit, chapter = 1, verse = 1}],
        verdict = Verdict,
        cast_at = erlang:system_time(millisecond)
    }.

generate_id() ->
    base64:encode(crypto:strong_rand_bytes(8)).